Trading Tips

Various tips and ideas for regarding trading and investing such as placing orders, using stops, etc… These tips are included within the content of the posts listed below.

Aug 142014

FFIN (First Financial Bankshares) is just one more in a long list of attractive short candidates in the regional banking sector. In fact, the chart pattern on FFIN looks very similar to the HIBB Active Short Trade with a similar topping pattern above a well-defined support shelf with a substantial thin zone below which is likely to be filled quickly once/if prices break support (as they did on HIBB).  FFIN will trigger a short entry below the 28.25 horizontal support level with a suggested stop above 29.10. The sole profit target at this time is 24.84, which would provide a 12% gain if hit, although this trade has the potential to morph into a much longer-term swing short trade with an ultimate downside target around the 18.70 level, depending on how both FFIN & the broad markets trade going forward.


I’ve included a 2-year, daily chart as well as a 4-year, 2-day period chart from TC2000 along with both the normal (adjusted) and unadjusted 2-year daily charts from to help illustrate the shortcomings of the charting platform. uses a default of plotting all historical stock prices adjusted for dividend payments instead of using the actual levels where trades took place in the past. The result is an inaccurate representation of historical prices when viewing the charts of dividend paying stocks. These distortions become more pronounced the longer the time period viewed and/or the higher the yield (past dividend payments) on the stock or ETF that you are viewing. The go-around solution for this issue is to add an underscore (“_”) before the ticker symbol which will render a chart showing the “unadjusted” price history of the security. This works fine unless the stock has split during the time period you are viewing as stockcharts does not “unadjust” for the change in price following the stock split.

TC2000, along with the free version,, by default will show stock price history that is unadjusted for dividend payments but adjusted for stock splits, which results in a true picture of the past trading history of the security… which is the basis for technical analysis & essential when trading IMO. FFIV is a good example of that difference as the TC2000 chart shows an extremely well-defined horizontal support level with numerous reactions while the default chart shows a slightly up-sloping (dashed) support line over the same period of time. There are several reasons that I subscribe to both charting services with one of those reasons is the ability to provide users of Right Side of the Chart links to the live, annotated charts, a feature that provides while TC2000 does not. Each of these charting platforms has their own pros and cons but when trading and especially setting trendline alerts, I will use TC2000 along with several other streaming real-time platforms from some of the various brokers that I use.

Aug 082014

The SPY hit my downside target originally posted here just over 3 weeks ago within pennies before reversing. I’ve included that original chart from July 17th in which I stated “T2 is my preferred target, which is the bottom of the 5/27 gap as well as the 50% Fib retracement level.” The bottom of the 5/27 (Tuesday) gap was the 5/23 (Friday) high of 190.48 , following a 3-day holiday weekend. The SPY kissed a low of 190.55 just before the close yesterday while putting a divergent (bullish) low on the intraday time frames (15-120 minute charts)… a mere 7 cents above the bottom of the gap and a good example of how stocks, sectors & indices often reverse just above or below the actually support level (hence the reasoning for placing my buy-to-cover orders on short trades slightly above the actual support level, although I wasn’t trading the SPY in this case).

That brings me to a point that I have discussed here before which is what I consider to be a major shortcoming of the charting platform: The inability to display the correct (true) price history of any dividend paying security on an intraday time frame. When viewing daily or weekly time frames, does allow for the viewing of the price history stocks and ETFs “unadjusted” for dividend payments (which I feel is a very important feature when using past price history to help determine future price direction… i.e.- technical analysis). However, the ability to view actual, i.e.- unadjusted, stock price history on intraday charts is not an option with I have address this issue with them in the past, to no avail, and the main reason that I continue to use is the ability to provide RSOTC followers the ability to view the live charts via hyperlinks (a feature not available in the overall superior TC2000/ charting platform).

As mentioned above, in this July 17th post, along with a static & live link to my 60 minute SPY chart from, I had stated the target which has now been hit on the SPY. Below is the previous 60 minute chart from July 17th followed by a screenshot of today’s 60 minute chart from, in which it appears prices fell well short of the bottom of that 5/23-5/27 gap. However, in viewing today’s 60 minute chart from TC2000, one can easily see the almost perfect kiss of the bottom of that gap before prices reversed. Again, I have discussed this shortcoming of in the past & don’t want to beat a dead horse but I feel that this is an important issue for those who trade using to be aware of, especially as is one of the more popular charting platforms in use today.


On the TC2000 60 minute chart above, I’ve also listed what I believe to be the two most likely scenarios for the SPY: Prices reversing at the former T1 level (now labeled R1 for 1st resistance level) OR prices continuing up to the R2 level (194.30ish) before reversing and kicking off the next major wave of selling. I’d have to give equal odds to either scenario at this time while a move above the 194.50 area would have near-term & possibly intermediate-term bullish implications.

Moving on to the bigger picture, earlier this week, the $SPX (S&P 500 Index) made a fairly solid intraweek breakdown below the uptrend line & is currently backtesting it from below. A solid close & follow-up move back inside the wedge next week would dampen the bearish scenario while a rejection off the trendline (on Monday) would likely trigger the next wave of selling & a move towards the 1750 area in the coming weeks. Should the $SPX fail to regain this key uptrend or even regain it into next week only to once again break below soon afterwards (a likely possibility), that would most likely lead to a breakdown of the $OEX (S&P 100 Index) below this critical bull market uptrend line generated off of the 2009 lows. As always, when trading off of the weekly time frames, it is the weekly close (end of Friday) that matters as intraweek dips below support are a fairly common occurrence and often prove to be whipsaw signals.


Jul 242014

The CSGP (Costar Group) short trade has been stopped out today, exceeding the previously suggested stop of 153.85 shortly after the open following an earnings induced gap. As mentioned recently, each trader must decided whether on not to hold or close a position before they report their quarterly earning results. A link to the Earnings Calendar is available under the Tools of the Trade area on the right side of the home page.

Gaps are unavoidable events with any type of trading other than day trading (where all positions are closed out by the end of each day).  Sometimes they go they way of your trade, sometimes against you.  My preference on any gap that goes against a short position is to wait until the order imbalances at the open moderate and then place a stop just above the peak high in the stock.  Sometimes the stock will power higher after the initial thrust, taking out your stop, but very often the opening gap proves to be an over-reaction with the stock moving lower afterwards.  Essentially a trader has two choices when caught on the wrong side of a gap:  1) Immediately close the position, thereby guaranteeing a loss or large give-back of any imbedded gains or 2) Set a stop above the initial reaction high, which will result in either a slightly larger loss (or give-back) or the gap is faded and the trade continues to play out, allowing for a better exit price and in some cases, the original profit target to be hit.

In the case of CSGP, the stock gapped to open at 148.08, below the suggested stop of 153.85, but quickly moved higher, exceeding the stop within the first minute of trading. The opening order imbalances continued to push the stock sharply higher for the first 20 minutes of trading until peaking at 165.83 before falling back nearly 9 points. Therefore, a trader that did not have a standing GTC stop-loss order that was taken out around 153.85 today & still happens to be short this one might consider a stop just above this morning’s peak reaction high of 165.83. However, as the 153.85 level was taken out shortly after the open, CSGP will now be moved from the Active Trades category to the Completed Trades category as a stopped out trade.

Jul 222014

First off, I just wanted to point out that the next few trading sessions are likely to be marked with increased volatility and above average chances for some fairly sizable opening gaps in either direction. The largest component of both the Nasdaq 100 & the S&P 500, AAPL (Apple), is scheduled to report earnings after the close today as well as another top component of both leading indices, MSFT (Microsoft). FB (Facebook) reports after the close tomorrow with AMZN (, another market leader, on deck for Thursday after the closing bell.

As far as how to or even whether or not to trade around earnings is completely up to each trader. Long-term investors shouldn’t be overly concerned with a companies quarterly earnings release other than maybe to time entries or exits on a position that they were already considering buying or selling. In other words, if one had a fat profit in a position of AAPL that they have been holding since the lows last year and they were already considering selling the stock as their profit target has been met or exceeded, why not step aside now vs. gambling on a possible 10%+ gap against their position tomorrow, should AAPL miss expectations or give less than stellar guidance?

In regards to swing trading, whether or not to hold a specific position into earnings or even to hold any positions during a period of such potential market moving releases as mentioned above is an important decision that each trader will have to make for him or her self. Some traders will always close positions before an earning release as part of their trading rules as to avoid Continue reading »

Jun 052014

With both GDX (Gold Miners ETF) & SIL (Silver Miners ETF) now solidly inside the thin zones, the chances for a continued move higher towards their respective targets is good. SIL gapped just above the top of the R1 downtrend line at the open today and hasn’t looked back. With prices solidly inside the thin zone, a continued move towards the top of the zone in the coming days is likely. Any pullbacks to the R2 level Continue reading »

Apr 242014

I wanted to add some follow-up comments regarding the two recently posted charts of the $OEX, both the 20 year weekly chart highlighting the time symmetry of the previous bull markets as well as the weekly chart posted earlier today highlighting the primary uptrend line of the current 5+ year bull market. Weekly charts spanning years or even decades are primarily used to identify secular and cyclical trends (bull & bear markets). Regardless how close those charts might appear to be signaling a primary trend change, those signals, or a least a break below the bull market uptrend line has not happened yet and could take months, possibly even years. Remember, support is support until broken and although the divergences currently in place indicate waning momentum and warn of a likely correction, sometimes divergences are negated when prices continue to climb, thereby eventually causing the indicators & oscillators to make new (higher) highs.

When trying to identify a primary trend change there is no single technical event that signals a change from bull to bear market, other than a price drop of the commonly used 20% figure. There is a common saying that market tops (and bottoms) are a process, not an event. That statement can be interpreted in several ways, Continue reading »

Apr 112014

Just to elaborate on my previous market comments, any bounce that may or may not materialize around the current support level on the Nasdaq 100 is expected to be a counter-trend rally in what I still believe to be the early stages of a much larger downtrend. Today the $NDX hit the first of four downside profit targets that have been listed on the $NDX live daily chart for some time now. My expectation at this time, which could change depending on how the charts play out going forward, is that before all is said & done, the $NDX will have fallen to my 4th & final (at this time) target which comes in around the 3150 level or the primary uptrend line on that chart, whichever comes first. That could take as long as several months or a short as several days, should the nearby support levels give way quickly.

With that being said, in order to most effectively utilize the trade ideas on RSOTC one must align the entries & exits of those trades with their own unique trading style and typical time frame. For example, very active, short-term traders like myself might opt to micro-manage a swing trade listing multiple price targets by booking profits as the earlier targets are hit (assuming the short-term charts confirm that a bounce is likely) while re-entering the position on the bounce with the intention of swinging the trade down to the final target(s). A less active, longer-term swing or trend trade might opt to ride out any short-term counter-trend bounces in the position with the intent of holding out for the 3rd or 4th target.

The bottom line is that trying to time all the minor swings in the market is not always easy and typically something best attempted by more seasoned traders. Those traders or investors that are longer-term bullish at this time should focus on initiating or adding to positions on pullbacks to support or breakouts of bullish chart patterns. For example, I’ve recently highlighted how well the 40-week EMA has defined major bull and bear trends in AAPL (Apple Inc.). After breaking down from the recently highlighted symmetrical triangle pattern on the daily chart, AAPL has now fallen to the 40-week EMA (which is the same as the 200 EMA on the daily chart), thereby offering an objective long entry, again for those who believe that the current correction has most likely run it’s course.  Those with a longer-term bearish view could wait for a solid weekly close or two below the 40-week EMA in order to establish a swing short position on the stock.

AAPL weekly April 11th

AAPL weekly April 11th

Again, we may or may not get a tradable bounce in the $NDX from this current support level and as such, I plan to update some of the trade ideas that still offer an objective entry for those looking to add any long or short exposure at this time. As I might be updating a number of trade ideas today, email notification may not be sent out on each update so best to check the site throughout the day or over the weekend if looking for any trade ideas at this time. On a final note, for the most part, I try to avoid establishing any new positions on a Friday, especially towards the end of the day due to the extra overnight risk associated with weekends. Based on all the volatility lately, chances are that the market is going to gap one way or the other on Monday and that gap could be sizable.