<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: UNG, Natural Gas ETP, Trade Setup	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://rightsideofthechart.com/ung-natural-gas-etp-trade-setup/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://rightsideofthechart.com/ung-natural-gas-etp-trade-setup/</link>
	<description>Stock Trading, Investing &#38; Market Analysis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Mar 2017 02:19:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: pangblood		</title>
		<link>https://rightsideofthechart.com/ung-natural-gas-etp-trade-setup/#comment-1091</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[pangblood]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Mar 2016 16:06:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightsideofthechart.com/?p=170242#comment-1091</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;a href=&#039;https://rightsideofthechart.com/members/rsotc/&#039; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;@rsotc&lt;/a&gt;
Hey Randy, can you provide a comment on today&#039;s natural gas price action?

Also, I really like the idea of making right side of the chart a subscription service, when do you think this will be implemented?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href='https://rightsideofthechart.com/members/rsotc/' rel="nofollow">@rsotc</a><br />
Hey Randy, can you provide a comment on today&#8217;s natural gas price action?</p>
<p>Also, I really like the idea of making right side of the chart a subscription service, when do you think this will be implemented?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: ixtlanian		</title>
		<link>https://rightsideofthechart.com/ung-natural-gas-etp-trade-setup/#comment-1053</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ixtlanian]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Mar 2016 15:02:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightsideofthechart.com/?p=170242#comment-1053</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[UNG passed the &lt;abbr class=&#039;c2c-text-hover&#039; title=&#039;First Profit Target&#039;&gt;T1&lt;/abbr&gt; zone on orange scenario. Randy - thanks for mentioning UGAZ and DGAZ as proxies. It would be very helpful if you could list possible trading proxies for all your trade ideas.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>UNG passed the <abbr class='c2c-text-hover' title='First Profit Target'>T1</abbr> zone on orange scenario. Randy &#8211; thanks for mentioning UGAZ and DGAZ as proxies. It would be very helpful if you could list possible trading proxies for all your trade ideas.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: rsotc		</title>
		<link>https://rightsideofthechart.com/ung-natural-gas-etp-trade-setup/#comment-1045</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[rsotc]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2016 22:42:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightsideofthechart.com/?p=170242#comment-1045</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://rightsideofthechart.com/ung-natural-gas-etp-trade-setup/#comment-1043&quot;&gt;pangblood&lt;/a&gt;.

The red &amp; green bars are a custom histogram that I created to give a better visual representation of the 13 &amp; 33 &lt;abbr class=&#039;c2c-text-hover&#039; title=&#039;An exponential moving average (EMA) is a type of moving average that is similar to a simple moving average, except that more weight is given to the latest data. This type of moving average reacts faster to recent price changes than a simple moving average. (source: investopedia.com)&#039;&gt;ema&lt;/abbr&gt; pair, which often works well on a lot of securities &amp; indices to define trends on that time frame. Here&#039;s a video that I made a while back to show how I made it: https://youtu.be/ax6OJ20mmiM]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://rightsideofthechart.com/ung-natural-gas-etp-trade-setup/#comment-1043">pangblood</a>.</p>
<p>The red &#038; green bars are a custom histogram that I created to give a better visual representation of the 13 &#038; 33 <abbr class='c2c-text-hover' title='An exponential moving average (EMA) is a type of moving average that is similar to a simple moving average, except that more weight is given to the latest data. This type of moving average reacts faster to recent price changes than a simple moving average. (source: investopedia.com)'>ema</abbr> pair, which often works well on a lot of securities &#038; indices to define trends on that time frame. Here&#8217;s a video that I made a while back to show how I made it: <a href="https://youtu.be/ax6OJ20mmiM" rel="nofollow ugc">https://youtu.be/ax6OJ20mmiM</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: pangblood		</title>
		<link>https://rightsideofthechart.com/ung-natural-gas-etp-trade-setup/#comment-1043</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[pangblood]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2016 21:02:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightsideofthechart.com/?p=170242#comment-1043</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://rightsideofthechart.com/ung-natural-gas-etp-trade-setup/#comment-1042&quot;&gt;rsotc&lt;/a&gt;.

&lt;a href=&#039;http://rightsideofthechart.com/members/rsotc/&#039; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;@rsotc&lt;/a&gt;
Cool! 
Also a quick question, what is the indicator that you are using (with the 13-33 setting) for the green cross?


Thanks! Looking forward to your videos and posts :D]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://rightsideofthechart.com/ung-natural-gas-etp-trade-setup/#comment-1042">rsotc</a>.</p>
<p><a href='http://rightsideofthechart.com/members/rsotc/' rel="nofollow">@rsotc</a><br />
Cool!<br />
Also a quick question, what is the indicator that you are using (with the 13-33 setting) for the green cross?</p>
<p>Thanks! Looking forward to your videos and posts :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: rsotc		</title>
		<link>https://rightsideofthechart.com/ung-natural-gas-etp-trade-setup/#comment-1042</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[rsotc]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2016 20:47:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightsideofthechart.com/?p=170242#comment-1042</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://rightsideofthechart.com/ung-natural-gas-etp-trade-setup/#comment-1041&quot;&gt;pangblood&lt;/a&gt;.

&lt;a href=&quot;http://rightsideofthechart.com/members/pangblood/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;@pangblood&lt;/a&gt; Good questions. First off, there are basically two main categories for long-side trade ideas: 1) Long Trade ideas (which included Long Setups &amp; Active Long Trades) which are actually swing trade ideas, as my primary trading style is swing trading and 2) &lt;abbr class=&#039;c2c-text-hover&#039; title=&#039;Long-term Trades are trade or investment ideas that have the potential for significant returns over a longer-term period than typical swing trades, with expected holding periods of several months or more.&#039;&gt;Long-term Trade&lt;/abbr&gt; ideas, which include longer-term trend trades &amp; investments that are expected to last several months or more &amp; typically offer above average gain potential. The Growth &amp; Income Trades are simply a sub-category of the Long-term Trades category that have above average income or dividend yields in addition to above average potential for capital appreciation. Each trade category has a description just below it although I probably need to revise the description or name of the Long Trade ideas to clarify that those are swing trade candidates.

UNG is both an Active Long (i.e.- swing trade) &amp; Long Trade Setup (as it still offers an objective entry or add-on), with the current price targets relative nearby based on the 60-minute chart. I posted that I idea as quickly as possible right after another member asked my thoughts on nat gas as I really liked what I saw &amp; just wanted to get the trade idea out there asap in case it started moving higher as it looked poised to do so.

As per my follow-up comments, I&#039;m also seeing some bullish developments on the longer-term charts and will likely add additional price targets to this trade based off the daily charts and if so, this trade will also be added to the Long-Term Trade ideas, as the potential for a multi-month or even 1 year+ rally (primary trend reversal) in natural gas prices seems very possible based on the charts at this time.

FWIW, your UGAZ should do okay as long as NG starts moving higher in a steady &lt;abbr class=&#039;c2c-text-hover&#039; title=&#039;An uptrend occurs when a security or index is making a series of higher highs &#038; higher lows.&#039;&gt;uptrend&lt;/abbr&gt; with minimal pullbacks &amp; periods of sideways consolidations. Hard to say if that will be the case but for the near-term, that wouldn&#039;t surprise me. G-luck!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://rightsideofthechart.com/ung-natural-gas-etp-trade-setup/#comment-1041">pangblood</a>.</p>
<p><a href="http://rightsideofthechart.com/members/pangblood/" rel="nofollow">@pangblood</a> Good questions. First off, there are basically two main categories for long-side trade ideas: 1) Long Trade ideas (which included Long Setups &#038; Active Long Trades) which are actually swing trade ideas, as my primary trading style is swing trading and 2) <abbr class='c2c-text-hover' title='Long-term Trades are trade or investment ideas that have the potential for significant returns over a longer-term period than typical swing trades, with expected holding periods of several months or more.'>Long-term Trade</abbr> ideas, which include longer-term trend trades &#038; investments that are expected to last several months or more &#038; typically offer above average gain potential. The Growth &#038; Income Trades are simply a sub-category of the Long-term Trades category that have above average income or dividend yields in addition to above average potential for capital appreciation. Each trade category has a description just below it although I probably need to revise the description or name of the Long Trade ideas to clarify that those are swing trade candidates.</p>
<p>UNG is both an Active Long (i.e.- swing trade) &#038; Long Trade Setup (as it still offers an objective entry or add-on), with the current price targets relative nearby based on the 60-minute chart. I posted that I idea as quickly as possible right after another member asked my thoughts on nat gas as I really liked what I saw &#038; just wanted to get the trade idea out there asap in case it started moving higher as it looked poised to do so.</p>
<p>As per my follow-up comments, I&#8217;m also seeing some bullish developments on the longer-term charts and will likely add additional price targets to this trade based off the daily charts and if so, this trade will also be added to the Long-Term Trade ideas, as the potential for a multi-month or even 1 year+ rally (primary trend reversal) in natural gas prices seems very possible based on the charts at this time.</p>
<p>FWIW, your UGAZ should do okay as long as NG starts moving higher in a steady <abbr class='c2c-text-hover' title='An uptrend occurs when a security or index is making a series of higher highs &amp; higher lows.'>uptrend</abbr> with minimal pullbacks &#038; periods of sideways consolidations. Hard to say if that will be the case but for the near-term, that wouldn&#8217;t surprise me. G-luck!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: pangblood		</title>
		<link>https://rightsideofthechart.com/ung-natural-gas-etp-trade-setup/#comment-1041</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[pangblood]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2016 20:19:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightsideofthechart.com/?p=170242#comment-1041</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;a href=&#039;http://rightsideofthechart.com/members/rsotc/&#039; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;@rsotc&lt;/a&gt;

Randy, I noticed that you placed this under &quot;active long trade&#039; instead of &quot;swing trade&#039;, does this mean you are expecting a longer time frame for the price action to materialize to your price targets (even though the price targets aren&#039;t that far from the current price)? 

I can&#039;t short dgaz, so I&#039;m holding ugaz, and obviously a longer time-frame and volatility will wipe me out. Also what are your opinions of today&#039;s price action, do you see the intraday pullback as a healthy normal &lt;abbr class=&#039;c2c-text-hover&#039; title=&#039;1) A bounce/pullback off support/resistance and/or a temporary consolidation around that level following a well-established trend leading up to that point. 2) A reaction low or high is a distinct point where the price of a security changed direction.&#039;&gt;reaction&lt;/abbr&gt;?

Also I strongly prefer videos, but whatever&#039;s more convenient with you would be best.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href='http://rightsideofthechart.com/members/rsotc/' rel="nofollow">@rsotc</a></p>
<p>Randy, I noticed that you placed this under &#8220;active long trade&#8217; instead of &#8220;swing trade&#8217;, does this mean you are expecting a longer time frame for the price action to materialize to your price targets (even though the price targets aren&#8217;t that far from the current price)? </p>
<p>I can&#8217;t short dgaz, so I&#8217;m holding ugaz, and obviously a longer time-frame and volatility will wipe me out. Also what are your opinions of today&#8217;s price action, do you see the intraday pullback as a healthy normal <abbr class='c2c-text-hover' title='1) A bounce/pullback off support/resistance and/or a temporary consolidation around that level following a well-established trend leading up to that point. 2) A reaction low or high is a distinct point where the price of a security changed direction.'>reaction</abbr>?</p>
<p>Also I strongly prefer videos, but whatever&#8217;s more convenient with you would be best.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: rsotc		</title>
		<link>https://rightsideofthechart.com/ung-natural-gas-etp-trade-setup/#comment-1039</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[rsotc]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2016 16:08:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightsideofthechart.com/?p=170242#comment-1039</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[For those that can&#039;t short DGAZ &amp; would prefer to use leverage but not be exposed to as much decay as UGAZ, BOIL is the Proshares Ultra Bloomberg Natural Gas ETF which employs 2x leverage to attempt to track natural gas prices through the use of short-term futures (as the other NG tracking ETFs do). They also offer KOLD, the 2x short NG ETF for that that want to position for a potentially longer-term short trade to attempt to benefit from both a rise in NG prices as well as the decay from the leveraged ETFs, as some brokers might not have shares of DGAZ available for their customers to short.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For those that can&#8217;t short DGAZ &#038; would prefer to use leverage but not be exposed to as much decay as UGAZ, BOIL is the Proshares Ultra Bloomberg Natural Gas ETF which employs 2x leverage to attempt to track natural gas prices through the use of short-term futures (as the other NG tracking ETFs do). They also offer KOLD, the 2x short NG ETF for that that want to position for a potentially longer-term short trade to attempt to benefit from both a rise in NG prices as well as the decay from the leveraged ETFs, as some brokers might not have shares of DGAZ available for their customers to short.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: rsotc		</title>
		<link>https://rightsideofthechart.com/ung-natural-gas-etp-trade-setup/#comment-1038</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[rsotc]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2016 15:35:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightsideofthechart.com/?p=170242#comment-1038</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://rightsideofthechart.com/ung-natural-gas-etp-trade-setup/#comment-1028&quot;&gt;bluemagic&lt;/a&gt;.

&lt;a href=&quot;http://rightsideofthechart.com/members/bluemagic/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;@bluemagic&lt;/a&gt; I also shorted DGAZ in as a nat gas long proxy yesterday as the case was made that nat gas very well may have bottomed, or at least is very close to a bottom. As such, I may very likely extend my price targets if the evidence continues to build that a bottom in natural gas is in. With that being said, if you&#039;re planning to hold out until NG tops, then it would be nearly impossible for me to give a price target now, even on UNG. I will say, however, that UNG has an extremely well defined former support shelf around 12.45, which is now a wall of resistance (and a magnet, should prices start to approach that level in 2016 or 2017). Of course, as all NG tracking ETFs, even the 1x&#039;s which use rolling futures contracts to track the price, are prone to slippage, I will ultimately align/confirm any longer-term price targets on UNG/DGAZ with the charts of $NATGAS (spot price).

Again, as you seem to be on the same page as I am with a likely bottom in or near on NG, then I would just tuck away that DGAZ short for now (with the appropriate stops in place, of course) and only be concerned with either adding to it as time goes on (since your short position/exposure will shrink as DGAZ falls in price), and maybe micro-manage (add/subtract/reverse) the trade around some as some of the more significant overhead resistance levels on UNG/$NATGAS are hit. 9.25 is the first big level on the daily chart of UNG where I&#039;d expect a considerable &lt;abbr class=&#039;c2c-text-hover&#039; title=&#039;1) A bounce/pullback off support/resistance and/or a temporary consolidation around that level following a well-established trend leading up to that point. 2) A reaction low or high is a distinct point where the price of a security changed direction.&#039;&gt;reaction&lt;/abbr&gt; at this time, then 10.07ish &amp; then the big 12.45 resistance. Best of luck on the trade!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://rightsideofthechart.com/ung-natural-gas-etp-trade-setup/#comment-1028">bluemagic</a>.</p>
<p><a href="http://rightsideofthechart.com/members/bluemagic/" rel="nofollow">@bluemagic</a> I also shorted DGAZ in as a nat gas long proxy yesterday as the case was made that nat gas very well may have bottomed, or at least is very close to a bottom. As such, I may very likely extend my price targets if the evidence continues to build that a bottom in natural gas is in. With that being said, if you&#8217;re planning to hold out until NG tops, then it would be nearly impossible for me to give a price target now, even on UNG. I will say, however, that UNG has an extremely well defined former support shelf around 12.45, which is now a wall of resistance (and a magnet, should prices start to approach that level in 2016 or 2017). Of course, as all NG tracking ETFs, even the 1x&#8217;s which use rolling futures contracts to track the price, are prone to slippage, I will ultimately align/confirm any longer-term price targets on UNG/DGAZ with the charts of $NATGAS (spot price).</p>
<p>Again, as you seem to be on the same page as I am with a likely bottom in or near on NG, then I would just tuck away that DGAZ short for now (with the appropriate stops in place, of course) and only be concerned with either adding to it as time goes on (since your short position/exposure will shrink as DGAZ falls in price), and maybe micro-manage (add/subtract/reverse) the trade around some as some of the more significant overhead resistance levels on UNG/$NATGAS are hit. 9.25 is the first big level on the daily chart of UNG where I&#8217;d expect a considerable <abbr class='c2c-text-hover' title='1) A bounce/pullback off support/resistance and/or a temporary consolidation around that level following a well-established trend leading up to that point. 2) A reaction low or high is a distinct point where the price of a security changed direction.'>reaction</abbr> at this time, then 10.07ish &#038; then the big 12.45 resistance. Best of luck on the trade!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: rsotc		</title>
		<link>https://rightsideofthechart.com/ung-natural-gas-etp-trade-setup/#comment-1033</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[rsotc]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2016 02:05:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightsideofthechart.com/?p=170242#comment-1033</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://rightsideofthechart.com/ung-natural-gas-etp-trade-setup/#comment-1029&quot;&gt;Mrg5a&lt;/a&gt;.

I just glanced a 10-year chart with nat gas plotted against the $SPX and yes, there certainly has been a pretty clear inverse correlation in recent years. However, the two fell in near-lockstep during the meltdown from mid-2008 right into the early March 2009 lows in the stock market. Since then, they have had a pretty tight inverse correlation with a few temporary disconnects here &#038; there.
I am unaware of the explanation for this, assuming there is a fundamental cause &#038; it isn&#039;t just mere coincidence. I will say that one of the reasons that I went long nat gas (via a DGAZ short) because my focus in 2016 has been on various stocks &#038; commodities that have a low or inverse correlation with the broad market (due to my longer-term bearish outlook), other than the two &quot;risk-on&quot; swing longs off the two major lows the market had so far this year. Should things play out the way I&#039;m positioned right now, the US equities (particularly the risk-on indices: QQQ, IWM, etc..) down/short &#038; nat gas up/long trade should play out well.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://rightsideofthechart.com/ung-natural-gas-etp-trade-setup/#comment-1029">Mrg5a</a>.</p>
<p>I just glanced a 10-year chart with nat gas plotted against the $SPX and yes, there certainly has been a pretty clear inverse correlation in recent years. However, the two fell in near-lockstep during the meltdown from mid-2008 right into the early March 2009 lows in the stock market. Since then, they have had a pretty tight inverse correlation with a few temporary disconnects here &amp; there.<br />
I am unaware of the explanation for this, assuming there is a fundamental cause &amp; it isn&#8217;t just mere coincidence. I will say that one of the reasons that I went long nat gas (via a DGAZ short) because my focus in 2016 has been on various stocks &amp; commodities that have a low or inverse correlation with the broad market (due to my longer-term bearish outlook), other than the two &#8220;risk-on&#8221; swing longs off the two major lows the market had so far this year. Should things play out the way I&#8217;m positioned right now, the US equities (particularly the risk-on indices: QQQ, IWM, etc..) down/short &amp; nat gas up/long trade should play out well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Mrg5a		</title>
		<link>https://rightsideofthechart.com/ung-natural-gas-etp-trade-setup/#comment-1029</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mrg5a]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2016 22:54:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightsideofthechart.com/?p=170242#comment-1029</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;a href=&#039;https://rightsideofthechart.com/members/rsotc/&#039; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;@rsotc&lt;/a&gt;
Could you comment on the following trading concept: Nat Gas inversely correlates with SPX. I have heard that Nat Gas is a synthetic short of the market. Why would this be? Seems completely random correlation. Thanks]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href='https://rightsideofthechart.com/members/rsotc/' rel="nofollow">@rsotc</a><br />
Could you comment on the following trading concept: Nat Gas inversely correlates with SPX. I have heard that Nat Gas is a synthetic short of the market. Why would this be? Seems completely random correlation. Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
