<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: US Market Outlook 3-13-16 (video)	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://rightsideofthechart.com/us-market-outlook-3-13-16-video/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://rightsideofthechart.com/us-market-outlook-3-13-16-video/</link>
	<description>Stock Trading, Investing &#38; Market Analysis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Mar 2017 02:19:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: snp		</title>
		<link>https://rightsideofthechart.com/us-market-outlook-3-13-16-video/#comment-1100</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[snp]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Mar 2016 04:29:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightsideofthechart.com/?p=170330#comment-1100</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://rightsideofthechart.com/us-market-outlook-3-13-16-video/#comment-1097&quot;&gt;rsotc&lt;/a&gt;.

lol.  yes I will!!!  good on ya]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://rightsideofthechart.com/us-market-outlook-3-13-16-video/#comment-1097">rsotc</a>.</p>
<p>lol.  yes I will!!!  good on ya</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: rsotc		</title>
		<link>https://rightsideofthechart.com/us-market-outlook-3-13-16-video/#comment-1097</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[rsotc]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Mar 2016 20:20:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightsideofthechart.com/?p=170330#comment-1097</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://rightsideofthechart.com/us-market-outlook-3-13-16-video/#comment-1095&quot;&gt;snp&lt;/a&gt;.

&lt;a href=&quot;http://rightsideofthechart.com/members/snp/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;@snp&lt;/a&gt; Then if you like long videos, you&#039;re going to love the Long Trade Ideas Update video that I just posted. ;-)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://rightsideofthechart.com/us-market-outlook-3-13-16-video/#comment-1095">snp</a>.</p>
<p><a href="http://rightsideofthechart.com/members/snp/" rel="nofollow">@snp</a> Then if you like long videos, you&#8217;re going to love the Long Trade Ideas Update video that I just posted. ;-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: vodeux		</title>
		<link>https://rightsideofthechart.com/us-market-outlook-3-13-16-video/#comment-1096</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[vodeux]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Mar 2016 18:38:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightsideofthechart.com/?p=170330#comment-1096</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[hmmm, i thought I covered everything u said and then some. Nevermind, I trade oil for a living. 60% loss of capital is nothing new and roof over my head meant that I trade within my means :) Anyways, good luck to u 2]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hmmm, i thought I covered everything u said and then some. Nevermind, I trade oil for a living. 60% loss of capital is nothing new and roof over my head meant that I trade within my means :) Anyways, good luck to u 2</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: snp		</title>
		<link>https://rightsideofthechart.com/us-market-outlook-3-13-16-video/#comment-1095</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[snp]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Mar 2016 18:18:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightsideofthechart.com/?p=170330#comment-1095</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://rightsideofthechart.com/us-market-outlook-3-13-16-video/#comment-1085&quot;&gt;rsotc&lt;/a&gt;.

I don&#039;t think long is negative.  actually I play most of your video 3 times or so to catch everything]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://rightsideofthechart.com/us-market-outlook-3-13-16-video/#comment-1085">rsotc</a>.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think long is negative.  actually I play most of your video 3 times or so to catch everything</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: jegersmart		</title>
		<link>https://rightsideofthechart.com/us-market-outlook-3-13-16-video/#comment-1094</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jegersmart]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Mar 2016 18:03:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightsideofthechart.com/?p=170330#comment-1094</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Vodeux

I think that is probably a coincidence that you heard it in a casino tbh, I cannot see any relevance. What I am saying is that one should trade a size which is not going to hurt you. Of course if your idea of risk management is still having a roof over your head if some trades go bad, then we are on totally different planets in terms of why and how we do this haha. I made almost 160% in the last 12 months, and no trades could have lost me more than 8% of my pot. I normally aim for under 4%, but have been fairly aggressive at times. The money management I am talking about is protecting your capital by trading within your limits. Losing 60% on one trade is totally unacceptable to me, I do this for a living - 60% is what sounds like a casino night to me.....seeing as you mentioned it:)

Anyway, not criticising - everyone has their own risk appetite - I wish you good luck in your endeavours. 

J]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vodeux</p>
<p>I think that is probably a coincidence that you heard it in a casino tbh, I cannot see any relevance. What I am saying is that one should trade a size which is not going to hurt you. Of course if your idea of risk management is still having a roof over your head if some trades go bad, then we are on totally different planets in terms of why and how we do this haha. I made almost 160% in the last 12 months, and no trades could have lost me more than 8% of my pot. I normally aim for under 4%, but have been fairly aggressive at times. The money management I am talking about is protecting your capital by trading within your limits. Losing 60% on one trade is totally unacceptable to me, I do this for a living &#8211; 60% is what sounds like a casino night to me&#8230;..seeing as you mentioned it:)</p>
<p>Anyway, not criticising &#8211; everyone has their own risk appetite &#8211; I wish you good luck in your endeavours. </p>
<p>J</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: vodeux		</title>
		<link>https://rightsideofthechart.com/us-market-outlook-3-13-16-video/#comment-1093</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[vodeux]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Mar 2016 17:08:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightsideofthechart.com/?p=170330#comment-1093</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Thanx J, not trying to degrade your comment, but the last time I heard that term was from my friend in a casino! He proceeded to lose $46k that night...true story. But the concept of money management surely differs among different people. &lt;abbr class=&#039;c2c-text-hover&#039; title=&#039;Risk-to-Reward Ratio. e.g.- a 3:1 R/R would entail risking $1 of loss for every $3 of profit potential on the trade.&#039;&gt;R/R&lt;/abbr&gt; goes hand in hand, higher risk = higher reward. My idea of money managment is that I just simply allocate whatever leftover money that I can afford into equities. I can sleep at night as I will still have a roof over my head if I just blow up one day. If your thinking of money management as in P/L then you simply can&#039;t expect to do proper money mangement on higher beta stuff such as commodities or tech companies, when the swing could be as high as 30% intraday. I noticed u r interested in oil and gold recently, and Im sure if you were in leveraged ETF&#039;s like ERX, UWTI, NGUT...a tight stop will be definately detrimental to any notion of managment. In anycase thanx again for ur advice, hope you were in ERY today~]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanx J, not trying to degrade your comment, but the last time I heard that term was from my friend in a casino! He proceeded to lose $46k that night&#8230;true story. But the concept of money management surely differs among different people. <abbr class='c2c-text-hover' title='Risk-to-Reward Ratio. e.g.- a 3:1 R/R would entail risking $1 of loss for every $3 of profit potential on the trade.'>R/R</abbr> goes hand in hand, higher risk = higher reward. My idea of money managment is that I just simply allocate whatever leftover money that I can afford into equities. I can sleep at night as I will still have a roof over my head if I just blow up one day. If your thinking of money management as in P/L then you simply can&#8217;t expect to do proper money mangement on higher beta stuff such as commodities or tech companies, when the swing could be as high as 30% intraday. I noticed u r interested in oil and gold recently, and Im sure if you were in leveraged ETF&#8217;s like ERX, UWTI, NGUT&#8230;a tight stop will be definately detrimental to any notion of managment. In anycase thanx again for ur advice, hope you were in ERY today~</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: jegersmart		</title>
		<link>https://rightsideofthechart.com/us-market-outlook-3-13-16-video/#comment-1092</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jegersmart]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Mar 2016 16:26:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightsideofthechart.com/?p=170330#comment-1092</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Vodeux

I would definitely look at your position sizes if you lost 60% in DUST and put the rest of your money back in it last week. The number one rule of trading is not technicals, fundamentals and so on - it is &quot;money management&quot;. That always comes first regardless of the processes you use to make trading decisions. This is not a criticism, just a reminder that this should unequivocally and always absolutely come first....

Good luck!

J]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vodeux</p>
<p>I would definitely look at your position sizes if you lost 60% in DUST and put the rest of your money back in it last week. The number one rule of trading is not technicals, fundamentals and so on &#8211; it is &#8220;money management&#8221;. That always comes first regardless of the processes you use to make trading decisions. This is not a criticism, just a reminder that this should unequivocally and always absolutely come first&#8230;.</p>
<p>Good luck!</p>
<p>J</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: vodeux		</title>
		<link>https://rightsideofthechart.com/us-market-outlook-3-13-16-video/#comment-1090</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[vodeux]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Mar 2016 15:35:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightsideofthechart.com/?p=170330#comment-1090</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[sure you r right on how id be confused on my next move should I have cash on hand, fortunately/unfortunately I dont have any cash atm... FYI I am still long aapl, and after losing about 60% on dust, I put all the rest of my money in it again last friday. I&#039;ve been following this site almost 5 years now (maybe longer) and I&#039;ve always respected randy&#039;s views and opinons. Its just that I recall his comment and arguement made for GDX a while back. Since we are quoting him, here&#039;s the quote:

&quot;high &amp; tight flag/pennant&quot; that appears to be forming in GDX. My answer was no (along with a brief explanation which can be viewed under that previous post) and this video covers in more detail as to why I still believe the &lt;abbr class=&#039;c2c-text-hover&#039; title=&#039;Risk-to-Reward Ratio. e.g.- a 3:1 R/R would entail risking $1 of loss for every $3 of profit potential on the trade.&#039;&gt;R/R&lt;/abbr&gt; for going long the miners at this time is unfavorable.

I remember this vividly because I added more dust after that video...Since then I dont follow so blindly into trade ideas. But on the brighter side I do have more trading techniques now thanx to the rally that followed after. Which brings to me to this latest video, and why i&#039;ve commented. The same pattern has emerged and the same agrument has been made, so this time I&#039;ll follow my prior experience and buy (if i had money). The saying goes, if it walks like a duck....etc
If RR is questionable just go ahead and buy a stock with a lower beta instead of something like dust and keep a tight stop.

This is for another time but I also dont agree with the analogy market up/gold down (vice versa) or Gold up/miners up (vice versa) analogy, just a quick chart or SP500&amp;gold here:
http://seekingalpha.com/article/270029-relationship-between-stock-price-direction-and-gold-silver-and-copper

u can see that sp500 and gold both rose during 2003 until 2009. and again from jul 2011-2013 (dont have charts). With this is mind the recent inverse relationship might change espeically with the announced interest rate hike.

as for the other contradictory comment I just noticed many times gold down miners up situations to recall. I wish i was sophisticated enough to the charts but then again I could be wrong if I did... anyways its just my 2 cents!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sure you r right on how id be confused on my next move should I have cash on hand, fortunately/unfortunately I dont have any cash atm&#8230; FYI I am still long aapl, and after losing about 60% on dust, I put all the rest of my money in it again last friday. I&#8217;ve been following this site almost 5 years now (maybe longer) and I&#8217;ve always respected randy&#8217;s views and opinons. Its just that I recall his comment and arguement made for GDX a while back. Since we are quoting him, here&#8217;s the quote:</p>
<p>&#8220;high &#038; tight flag/pennant&#8221; that appears to be forming in GDX. My answer was no (along with a brief explanation which can be viewed under that previous post) and this video covers in more detail as to why I still believe the <abbr class='c2c-text-hover' title='Risk-to-Reward Ratio. e.g.- a 3:1 R/R would entail risking $1 of loss for every $3 of profit potential on the trade.'>R/R</abbr> for going long the miners at this time is unfavorable.</p>
<p>I remember this vividly because I added more dust after that video&#8230;Since then I dont follow so blindly into trade ideas. But on the brighter side I do have more trading techniques now thanx to the rally that followed after. Which brings to me to this latest video, and why i&#8217;ve commented. The same pattern has emerged and the same agrument has been made, so this time I&#8217;ll follow my prior experience and buy (if i had money). The saying goes, if it walks like a duck&#8230;.etc<br />
If RR is questionable just go ahead and buy a stock with a lower beta instead of something like dust and keep a tight stop.</p>
<p>This is for another time but I also dont agree with the analogy market up/gold down (vice versa) or Gold up/miners up (vice versa) analogy, just a quick chart or SP500&#038;gold here:<br />
<a href="http://seekingalpha.com/article/270029-relationship-between-stock-price-direction-and-gold-silver-and-copper" rel="nofollow ugc">http://seekingalpha.com/article/270029-relationship-between-stock-price-direction-and-gold-silver-and-copper</a></p>
<p>u can see that sp500 and gold both rose during 2003 until 2009. and again from jul 2011-2013 (dont have charts). With this is mind the recent inverse relationship might change espeically with the announced interest rate hike.</p>
<p>as for the other contradictory comment I just noticed many times gold down miners up situations to recall. I wish i was sophisticated enough to the charts but then again I could be wrong if I did&#8230; anyways its just my 2 cents!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: jegersmart		</title>
		<link>https://rightsideofthechart.com/us-market-outlook-3-13-16-video/#comment-1087</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jegersmart]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Mar 2016 14:01:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightsideofthechart.com/?p=170330#comment-1087</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Vodeux

Thanks for sharing your thoughts. I think many are calling it a &quot;bear market rally&quot;, simply because currently it is. That is to say that no new ATH high has been made from where the &lt;abbr class=&#039;c2c-text-hover&#039; title=&#039;A downtrend occurs when a security or index is making a series of lower lows &#038; lower highs.&#039;&gt;downtrend&lt;/abbr&gt; began. No one is saying it is impossible for the market to make new ATH, and of course at some point it definitely will - the point is that if you had cash now that you wanted to put in a short term trade would you go long or short? Currently this is a bear market rally, because it is rallying within a downtrend. If it breaks out of the downtrend decisively and on volume then the game changes. That is why Randy has given some indications in terms of his &quot;lines in the sand&quot; - limits to where he still feels that the RR ratio is still short. We will of course see what happens and look forward to hearing where you are putting your money....:)

J]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vodeux</p>
<p>Thanks for sharing your thoughts. I think many are calling it a &#8220;bear market rally&#8221;, simply because currently it is. That is to say that no new ATH high has been made from where the <abbr class='c2c-text-hover' title='A downtrend occurs when a security or index is making a series of lower lows &amp; lower highs.'>downtrend</abbr> began. No one is saying it is impossible for the market to make new ATH, and of course at some point it definitely will &#8211; the point is that if you had cash now that you wanted to put in a short term trade would you go long or short? Currently this is a bear market rally, because it is rallying within a downtrend. If it breaks out of the downtrend decisively and on volume then the game changes. That is why Randy has given some indications in terms of his &#8220;lines in the sand&#8221; &#8211; limits to where he still feels that the RR ratio is still short. We will of course see what happens and look forward to hearing where you are putting your money&#8230;.:)</p>
<p>J</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: vodeux		</title>
		<link>https://rightsideofthechart.com/us-market-outlook-3-13-16-video/#comment-1086</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[vodeux]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Mar 2016 13:06:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightsideofthechart.com/?p=170330#comment-1086</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[There is clearly a tight flag on the sp-500 and the qqq end feb and early march. It should point that the market will rally not breakdown. Also The last part of sp-500 looks alot like GDX with its never dying hypobolic curve. Everyone in the market including their mothers are calling this a bear market rally, and I think its never that easy to call an end to the bulls especially with this kind of mometum. Just dont be so surprised when the market rallies another 5-10% in march.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is clearly a tight flag on the sp-500 and the qqq end feb and early march. It should point that the market will rally not breakdown. Also The last part of sp-500 looks alot like GDX with its never dying hypobolic curve. Everyone in the market including their mothers are calling this a bear market rally, and I think its never that easy to call an end to the bulls especially with this kind of mometum. Just dont be so surprised when the market rallies another 5-10% in march.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: rsotc		</title>
		<link>https://rightsideofthechart.com/us-market-outlook-3-13-16-video/#comment-1085</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[rsotc]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Mar 2016 13:03:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightsideofthechart.com/?p=170330#comment-1085</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://rightsideofthechart.com/us-market-outlook-3-13-16-video/#comment-1078&quot;&gt;snp&lt;/a&gt;.

&lt;a href=&quot;http://rightsideofthechart.com/members/snp/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;@snp&lt;/a&gt; Comprehensive- Translation: Long... lol.  Still working to get all videos down to 15-20 minutes in duration but it can hard enough to predict where the market going that simply talking about just a couple of time frames or indicators only tells a small part of a much bigger picture.

To all, thx for the feedback. BTW, that bearish rising wedge on crude futures that was posted in the trading room last week has broken down impulsively today. Will post the chart in a minute.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://rightsideofthechart.com/us-market-outlook-3-13-16-video/#comment-1078">snp</a>.</p>
<p><a href="http://rightsideofthechart.com/members/snp/" rel="nofollow">@snp</a> Comprehensive- Translation: Long&#8230; lol.  Still working to get all videos down to 15-20 minutes in duration but it can hard enough to predict where the market going that simply talking about just a couple of time frames or indicators only tells a small part of a much bigger picture.</p>
<p>To all, thx for the feedback. BTW, that bearish rising wedge on crude futures that was posted in the trading room last week has broken down impulsively today. Will post the chart in a minute.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Shambo		</title>
		<link>https://rightsideofthechart.com/us-market-outlook-3-13-16-video/#comment-1084</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Shambo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Mar 2016 10:44:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightsideofthechart.com/?p=170330#comment-1084</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Thanks Randy, great video, clear analysis.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Randy, great video, clear analysis.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Shambo		</title>
		<link>https://rightsideofthechart.com/us-market-outlook-3-13-16-video/#comment-1083</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Shambo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Mar 2016 10:44:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightsideofthechart.com/?p=170330#comment-1083</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Thanks Randy, great video, clear analysis.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Randy, great video, clear analysis.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: schooner		</title>
		<link>https://rightsideofthechart.com/us-market-outlook-3-13-16-video/#comment-1082</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[schooner]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Mar 2016 05:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightsideofthechart.com/?p=170330#comment-1082</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Well done summary Randy -- you kept me up late! I agree that we are coming into a critical area -- and interestingly enough we are working our way towards favorable seasonality for the downside. Thanks for the great work.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well done summary Randy &#8212; you kept me up late! I agree that we are coming into a critical area &#8212; and interestingly enough we are working our way towards favorable seasonality for the downside. Thanks for the great work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: detailsart		</title>
		<link>https://rightsideofthechart.com/us-market-outlook-3-13-16-video/#comment-1081</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[detailsart]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Mar 2016 04:19:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightsideofthechart.com/?p=170330#comment-1081</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Thanks for the market update and overview. Informative as always. The major indexes have been up for four weeks which suggests that we may be in overbought territory. But, many indexes are also just pushing above the 200 DMA which begs the question of programed trading. Will a move above the 200 DMA contribute to automated buying pressure of ETF&#039;s and equities (assuming all other external factors remain neutral) and thereby push the SPX higher? Thoughts?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the market update and overview. Informative as always. The major indexes have been up for four weeks which suggests that we may be in overbought territory. But, many indexes are also just pushing above the 200 DMA which begs the question of programed trading. Will a move above the 200 DMA contribute to automated buying pressure of ETF&#8217;s and equities (assuming all other external factors remain neutral) and thereby push the SPX higher? Thoughts?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: david k		</title>
		<link>https://rightsideofthechart.com/us-market-outlook-3-13-16-video/#comment-1080</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[david k]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Mar 2016 03:30:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightsideofthechart.com/?p=170330#comment-1080</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Fantastic work Randy. Thank you.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fantastic work Randy. Thank you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: joefriday		</title>
		<link>https://rightsideofthechart.com/us-market-outlook-3-13-16-video/#comment-1079</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[joefriday]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Mar 2016 01:10:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightsideofthechart.com/?p=170330#comment-1079</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Love it man!... Great work!!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Love it man!&#8230; Great work!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: snp		</title>
		<link>https://rightsideofthechart.com/us-market-outlook-3-13-16-video/#comment-1078</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[snp]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Mar 2016 01:00:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightsideofthechart.com/?p=170330#comment-1078</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[comprehensive!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>comprehensive!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
