<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: US Equity Market Near-term Outlook (video)	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://rightsideofthechart.com/us-equity-market-near-term-outlook-video/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://rightsideofthechart.com/us-equity-market-near-term-outlook-video/</link>
	<description>Stock Trading, Investing &#38; Market Analysis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Mar 2017 02:19:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Kstellish		</title>
		<link>https://rightsideofthechart.com/us-equity-market-near-term-outlook-video/#comment-1220</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kstellish]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2016 22:52:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightsideofthechart.com/?p=170740#comment-1220</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Appreciate the quick synopsis. I know most of your focus has been on the QQQs as the leading indicator but I was curious if you eventually expand your shorts into other indices as they roll over or do you prefer sticking with one. I assume they all move pretty close in tandem with some variability. The reason I ask is because I&#039;ve noticed the SPY/SPX make a bigger dent on the engulfing candle from Friday (actually closing below Friday&#039;s open). While not getting too caught up in intraday charting, it looks like the MACD, RSI, stochastics, CCI, etc all seem to be sliding towards that downward move with the MACD actually beginning its cross on the daily.  Divergences also present. I guess my question is, is it because you see a greater &lt;abbr class=&#039;c2c-text-hover&#039; title=&#039;Risk-to-Reward Ratio. e.g.- a 3:1 R/R would entail risking $1 of loss for every $3 of profit potential on the trade.&#039;&gt;R/R&lt;/abbr&gt; with the QQQ as opposed to the SPY or is the SPY an appropriate option as well? 

Also, assuming the bearish case takes shape, at what point would you increase your short exposure?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Appreciate the quick synopsis. I know most of your focus has been on the QQQs as the leading indicator but I was curious if you eventually expand your shorts into other indices as they roll over or do you prefer sticking with one. I assume they all move pretty close in tandem with some variability. The reason I ask is because I&#8217;ve noticed the SPY/SPX make a bigger dent on the engulfing candle from Friday (actually closing below Friday&#8217;s open). While not getting too caught up in intraday charting, it looks like the MACD, RSI, stochastics, CCI, etc all seem to be sliding towards that downward move with the MACD actually beginning its cross on the daily.  Divergences also present. I guess my question is, is it because you see a greater <abbr class='c2c-text-hover' title='Risk-to-Reward Ratio. e.g.- a 3:1 R/R would entail risking $1 of loss for every $3 of profit potential on the trade.'>R/R</abbr> with the QQQ as opposed to the SPY or is the SPY an appropriate option as well? </p>
<p>Also, assuming the bearish case takes shape, at what point would you increase your short exposure?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
