<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Stock Market Technical Analysis 5-16-19	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://rightsideofthechart.com/stock-market-technical-analysis-5-16-19/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://rightsideofthechart.com/stock-market-technical-analysis-5-16-19/</link>
	<description>Stock Trading, Investing &#38; Market Analysis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 08 Jun 2019 17:16:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: snp		</title>
		<link>https://rightsideofthechart.com/stock-market-technical-analysis-5-16-19/#comment-6406</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[snp]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Jun 2019 17:16:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://rightsideofthechart.com/?p=191286#comment-6406</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[sorry about the profanity.  thought i have been substituting characters in the word but i missed that one.
i did see that video and understand your scale in technique.  it makes sense.  not buying where you expect resistance and then buying after that resistance is broken and vise versa.  i read those strategies everywhere: would not short until price is below blah blah.  just seems odd to me to wait for a lower price to short when the goal is to short at the absolutely highest level to gain the maximum amount.  definitely understand your position and strategy.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sorry about the profanity.  thought i have been substituting characters in the word but i missed that one.<br />
i did see that video and understand your scale in technique.  it makes sense.  not buying where you expect resistance and then buying after that resistance is broken and vise versa.  i read those strategies everywhere: would not short until price is below blah blah.  just seems odd to me to wait for a lower price to short when the goal is to short at the absolutely highest level to gain the maximum amount.  definitely understand your position and strategy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: rsotc		</title>
		<link>https://rightsideofthechart.com/stock-market-technical-analysis-5-16-19/#comment-6405</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[rsotc]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Jun 2019 16:41:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://rightsideofthechart.com/?p=191286#comment-6405</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://rightsideofthechart.com/stock-market-technical-analysis-5-16-19/#comment-6169&quot;&gt;snp&lt;/a&gt;.

Comment edited. As per the Terms &amp; Conditions of the site, please refrain from using profanity on the site: https://rightsideofthechart.com/policies-terms/

I certainly respect different trading styles. You might also want to watch recent videos in which I stated numerous times a pre-determined trading plan to scale in at that scale-in zone up to but not above those levels.

To your strategy of waiting to enter a trade at a specific price target &amp; then only scaling in if price moves against you (which is contrary to the preferred strategy of most experienced/professional traders that prefer to add as a position goes in the direction of the trade, as that helps to confirm they were correct, not wrong on their analysis), my experience has been if I thought that a potential trade that I was looking to enter was going to $X before starting the move I was planning to position for, more than often, that security might reverse just shy of $X, leaving me to watch a position walk away &amp; go on to play out as I has expected without me.

Just as I will close a long trade just shy of the level that I expect the position to reverse (as to not risk missing a fill for a few extra cents with the trade suddenly reversing if the sellers step in early), when looking to enter a position, whether or &quot;one &amp; done&quot; full position entry or a planned scale-in, I would rather start a bit earlier than a bit too late &amp; risk missing the trade. Again, different styles so to each his own.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://rightsideofthechart.com/stock-market-technical-analysis-5-16-19/#comment-6169">snp</a>.</p>
<p>Comment edited. As per the Terms &#038; Conditions of the site, please refrain from using profanity on the site: <a href="https://rightsideofthechart.com/policies-terms/" rel="ugc">https://rightsideofthechart.com/policies-terms/</a></p>
<p>I certainly respect different trading styles. You might also want to watch recent videos in which I stated numerous times a pre-determined trading plan to scale in at that scale-in zone up to but not above those levels.</p>
<p>To your strategy of waiting to enter a trade at a specific price target &#038; then only scaling in if price moves against you (which is contrary to the preferred strategy of most experienced/professional traders that prefer to add as a position goes in the direction of the trade, as that helps to confirm they were correct, not wrong on their analysis), my experience has been if I thought that a potential trade that I was looking to enter was going to $X before starting the move I was planning to position for, more than often, that security might reverse just shy of $X, leaving me to watch a position walk away &#038; go on to play out as I has expected without me.</p>
<p>Just as I will close a long trade just shy of the level that I expect the position to reverse (as to not risk missing a fill for a few extra cents with the trade suddenly reversing if the sellers step in early), when looking to enter a position, whether or &#8220;one &#038; done&#8221; full position entry or a planned scale-in, I would rather start a bit earlier than a bit too late &#038; risk missing the trade. Again, different styles so to each his own.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: snp		</title>
		<link>https://rightsideofthechart.com/stock-market-technical-analysis-5-16-19/#comment-6169</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[snp]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2019 06:52:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://rightsideofthechart.com/?p=191286#comment-6169</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[sorry but my analog bull (edit/censored by admin) meter went off the rsots (right side of the scale) on the scaling in part.  jesse livermore also went broke how many times?  i scale in as price moves against me if i think i have a good level.  if i dont think i have a good level, i would not have entered.  i never scale in on the way toward my target.  it simply dilutes your entry price and increases risk of loss if price reverses.  just a difference in trading style.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sorry but my analog bull (edit/censored by admin) meter went off the rsots (right side of the scale) on the scaling in part.  jesse livermore also went broke how many times?  i scale in as price moves against me if i think i have a good level.  if i dont think i have a good level, i would not have entered.  i never scale in on the way toward my target.  it simply dilutes your entry price and increases risk of loss if price reverses.  just a difference in trading style.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
