<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Stock Market &#038; FAAMG Analysis 3-29-23	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://rightsideofthechart.com/stock-market-faamg-analysis-3-29-23/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://rightsideofthechart.com/stock-market-faamg-analysis-3-29-23/</link>
	<description>Stock Trading, Investing &#38; Market Analysis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Jun 2023 18:42:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: thebeagle55		</title>
		<link>https://rightsideofthechart.com/stock-market-faamg-analysis-3-29-23/#comment-26977</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[thebeagle55]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Mar 2023 13:16:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://rightsideofthechart.com/?p=211117#comment-26977</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://rightsideofthechart.com/stock-market-faamg-analysis-3-29-23/#comment-26976&quot;&gt;Manuj&lt;/a&gt;.

its dangerous when you think to yourself im right and the
mkt wrong.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://rightsideofthechart.com/stock-market-faamg-analysis-3-29-23/#comment-26976">Manuj</a>.</p>
<p>its dangerous when you think to yourself im right and the<br />
mkt wrong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Manuj		</title>
		<link>https://rightsideofthechart.com/stock-market-faamg-analysis-3-29-23/#comment-26976</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Manuj]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Mar 2023 12:56:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://rightsideofthechart.com/?p=211117#comment-26976</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Liquidity is making thks scam market going up.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Liquidity is making thks scam market going up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: trade0039		</title>
		<link>https://rightsideofthechart.com/stock-market-faamg-analysis-3-29-23/#comment-26973</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[trade0039]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Mar 2023 01:54:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://rightsideofthechart.com/?p=211117#comment-26973</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://rightsideofthechart.com/stock-market-faamg-analysis-3-29-23/#comment-26960&quot;&gt;Jeff Vandenburgh&lt;/a&gt;.

You its true, you see what you want to see! I kinda agree with your analysis and we are a technical traders and clearly all major indices are making HH and HL but fundamentally I feel like worse is yet to come and for some reason I feel like Wall Street is setting up the biggest BULL TRAP in history which is why I am Short at this level and been holding the short since Oct 2022!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://rightsideofthechart.com/stock-market-faamg-analysis-3-29-23/#comment-26960">Jeff Vandenburgh</a>.</p>
<p>You its true, you see what you want to see! I kinda agree with your analysis and we are a technical traders and clearly all major indices are making HH and HL but fundamentally I feel like worse is yet to come and for some reason I feel like Wall Street is setting up the biggest BULL TRAP in history which is why I am Short at this level and been holding the short since Oct 2022!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: becky		</title>
		<link>https://rightsideofthechart.com/stock-market-faamg-analysis-3-29-23/#comment-26970</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[becky]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Mar 2023 21:39:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://rightsideofthechart.com/?p=211117#comment-26970</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://rightsideofthechart.com/stock-market-faamg-analysis-3-29-23/#comment-26958&quot;&gt;jmccallum&lt;/a&gt;.

1y is at 4.4% + .10 this is about 4.5% loan to banks.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://rightsideofthechart.com/stock-market-faamg-analysis-3-29-23/#comment-26958">jmccallum</a>.</p>
<p>1y is at 4.4% + .10 this is about 4.5% loan to banks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: JimG		</title>
		<link>https://rightsideofthechart.com/stock-market-faamg-analysis-3-29-23/#comment-26969</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[JimG]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Mar 2023 20:06:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://rightsideofthechart.com/?p=211117#comment-26969</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://rightsideofthechart.com/stock-market-faamg-analysis-3-29-23/#comment-26963&quot;&gt;thebeagle55&lt;/a&gt;.

I think we should see a trap.. so am short term bearish this afternoon. But all of it fixed risk. With a 30-90 day window. The set up is there for a pull back, but in every strong advance there will be divergence showing up. you have to pick your battles with Randys calls. This divergence coupled with the proximity to trapping a huge number of longs and stopping out the last hold outs in the short camp i think is worth it. But 99% of my $ is earning 4+% interest until I can be convinced to go long for a couple years.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://rightsideofthechart.com/stock-market-faamg-analysis-3-29-23/#comment-26963">thebeagle55</a>.</p>
<p>I think we should see a trap.. so am short term bearish this afternoon. But all of it fixed risk. With a 30-90 day window. The set up is there for a pull back, but in every strong advance there will be divergence showing up. you have to pick your battles with Randys calls. This divergence coupled with the proximity to trapping a huge number of longs and stopping out the last hold outs in the short camp i think is worth it. But 99% of my $ is earning 4+% interest until I can be convinced to go long for a couple years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: thebeagle55		</title>
		<link>https://rightsideofthechart.com/stock-market-faamg-analysis-3-29-23/#comment-26963</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[thebeagle55]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Mar 2023 19:06:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://rightsideofthechart.com/?p=211117#comment-26963</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[randy tells us hes bearish with all of us on here bullish..
maybe not such a great move..
Nat gas all over again... when youre wrong youre wrong
end of story]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>randy tells us hes bearish with all of us on here bullish..<br />
maybe not such a great move..<br />
Nat gas all over again&#8230; when youre wrong youre wrong<br />
end of story</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Jeff Vandenburgh		</title>
		<link>https://rightsideofthechart.com/stock-market-faamg-analysis-3-29-23/#comment-26962</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff Vandenburgh]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Mar 2023 19:04:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://rightsideofthechart.com/?p=211117#comment-26962</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://rightsideofthechart.com/stock-market-faamg-analysis-3-29-23/#comment-26961&quot;&gt;Jeff Vandenburgh&lt;/a&gt;.

In hindsight we might look back and wonder why we didn&#039;t buy with all the leverage we could get ahold of when QQQ retested of the 200dayMA while at the same time the Fed pivoted.  Could have been the best buying opportunity of the next ten years.  Otherwise, we really need to hope and pray for absolute economic destruction for Randy&#039;s bearish thesis to play out.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://rightsideofthechart.com/stock-market-faamg-analysis-3-29-23/#comment-26961">Jeff Vandenburgh</a>.</p>
<p>In hindsight we might look back and wonder why we didn&#8217;t buy with all the leverage we could get ahold of when QQQ retested of the 200dayMA while at the same time the Fed pivoted.  Could have been the best buying opportunity of the next ten years.  Otherwise, we really need to hope and pray for absolute economic destruction for Randy&#8217;s bearish thesis to play out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Jeff Vandenburgh		</title>
		<link>https://rightsideofthechart.com/stock-market-faamg-analysis-3-29-23/#comment-26961</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff Vandenburgh]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Mar 2023 18:59:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://rightsideofthechart.com/?p=211117#comment-26961</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://rightsideofthechart.com/stock-market-faamg-analysis-3-29-23/#comment-26958&quot;&gt;jmccallum&lt;/a&gt;.

Thanks for the info!  Although I appreciate Darius Dale&#039;s work, he is not a &quot;trader&quot; and I actually subscribed to his newsletter and lost money on every suggested trade.  The BTFP may or may not be what we previously called &lt;abbr class=&#039;c2c-text-hover&#039; title=&#039;Quantitative easing (QE) is a type of monetary policy used by central banks to stimulate the economy when standard monetary policy has become ineffective.&#039;&gt;QE&lt;/abbr&gt;, but it does indicate a massive Fed pivot, and that&#039;s all that matters to the market.  BTFP = &quot;Buy the F--ing Pivot!&quot;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://rightsideofthechart.com/stock-market-faamg-analysis-3-29-23/#comment-26958">jmccallum</a>.</p>
<p>Thanks for the info!  Although I appreciate Darius Dale&#8217;s work, he is not a &#8220;trader&#8221; and I actually subscribed to his newsletter and lost money on every suggested trade.  The BTFP may or may not be what we previously called <abbr class='c2c-text-hover' title='Quantitative easing (QE) is a type of monetary policy used by central banks to stimulate the economy when standard monetary policy has become ineffective.'>QE</abbr>, but it does indicate a massive Fed pivot, and that&#8217;s all that matters to the market.  BTFP = &#8220;Buy the F&#8211;ing Pivot!&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Jeff Vandenburgh		</title>
		<link>https://rightsideofthechart.com/stock-market-faamg-analysis-3-29-23/#comment-26960</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff Vandenburgh]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Mar 2023 18:49:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://rightsideofthechart.com/?p=211117#comment-26960</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Please take a look at the weekly charts of the FAANMGs and tell me they&#039;re not bullish. 
AAPL is in a giant multi-year bull-flag pattern.
AMZN has come off of a big weekly bullish RSI divergence.
MSFT has clearly bottomed and in a strong &lt;abbr class=&#039;c2c-text-hover&#039; title=&#039;An uptrend occurs when a security or index is making a series of higher highs &#038; higher lows.&#039;&gt;uptrend&lt;/abbr&gt;.
NVDA in a perfect V-recovery that should not stop shy of the previous all time highs.
META is depressing to look at because it&#039;s so darn bullish.
But GOOGL... GOOGL is the only one that looks sort of ...meh.
XLK is only 3% away from the August highs and the neckline from where it broke down in 2022.  Is it not bullish if XLK gets back above there?  Do weekly charts not matter?  Do bullish patterns on hourly chart not matter?  Because clearly they&#039;ve been playing out.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please take a look at the weekly charts of the FAANMGs and tell me they&#8217;re not bullish.<br />
AAPL is in a giant multi-year bull-flag pattern.<br />
AMZN has come off of a big weekly bullish RSI divergence.<br />
MSFT has clearly bottomed and in a strong <abbr class='c2c-text-hover' title='An uptrend occurs when a security or index is making a series of higher highs &amp; higher lows.'>uptrend</abbr>.<br />
NVDA in a perfect V-recovery that should not stop shy of the previous all time highs.<br />
META is depressing to look at because it&#8217;s so darn bullish.<br />
But GOOGL&#8230; GOOGL is the only one that looks sort of &#8230;meh.<br />
XLK is only 3% away from the August highs and the neckline from where it broke down in 2022.  Is it not bullish if XLK gets back above there?  Do weekly charts not matter?  Do bullish patterns on hourly chart not matter?  Because clearly they&#8217;ve been playing out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Manuj		</title>
		<link>https://rightsideofthechart.com/stock-market-faamg-analysis-3-29-23/#comment-26959</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Manuj]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Mar 2023 18:43:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://rightsideofthechart.com/?p=211117#comment-26959</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hi Randy, can you please share ES (SP500 futures) levels please, I went through 3 videos and didn&#039;t find it. Thanks :)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Randy, can you please share ES (SP500 futures) levels please, I went through 3 videos and didn&#8217;t find it. Thanks :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: jmccallum		</title>
		<link>https://rightsideofthechart.com/stock-market-faamg-analysis-3-29-23/#comment-26958</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jmccallum]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Mar 2023 18:38:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://rightsideofthechart.com/?p=211117#comment-26958</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://rightsideofthechart.com/stock-market-faamg-analysis-3-29-23/#comment-26957&quot;&gt;jmccallum&lt;/a&gt;.

To understand how BTFP does this, here are some its &lt;em&gt;key aspects&lt;/em&gt;:

&lt;ul&gt;&lt;li&gt;When in need of capital, eligible banks (any US FDIC and some foreign banks) can &lt;em&gt;borrow against their securities&lt;/em&gt; instead of selling them in the open market,&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Eligible securities are U.S. Treasuries and &lt;em&gt;high quality&lt;/em&gt; mortgage-backed securities&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;There is no haircut, banks can borrow up to &lt;em&gt;100% of the collateral&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;That collateral is valued &lt;em&gt;at par, not market value&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;The rate is the &lt;em&gt;1 year overnight swap rate (OIS)&lt;/em&gt; plus &lt;em&gt;10 (measly) bps&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;em&gt;No pre-payment&lt;/em&gt; penalty&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Loan term is for &lt;em&gt;1 year&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;em&gt;No transaction fees&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;em&gt;Treasury is backstopping&lt;/em&gt; the Fed banks for program&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Program is in effect until &lt;em&gt;at least&lt;/em&gt; March 11, 2024&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;In other words, there are &lt;em&gt;no fees&lt;/em&gt;, &lt;em&gt;no penalties&lt;/em&gt;, banks can pledge Treasuries and &lt;em&gt;borrow against 100%&lt;/em&gt; of their &lt;em&gt;face value&lt;/em&gt; at a cost of the &lt;em&gt;1yr swap rate + 10bps&lt;/em&gt;.
In finance, we would call this a &lt;em&gt;sweetheart deal&lt;/em&gt;. So attractive as to be unethical or illegal.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://rightsideofthechart.com/stock-market-faamg-analysis-3-29-23/#comment-26957">jmccallum</a>.</p>
<p>To understand how BTFP does this, here are some its <em>key aspects</em>:</p>
<ul>
<li>When in need of capital, eligible banks (any US FDIC and some foreign banks) can <em>borrow against their securities</em> instead of selling them in the open market,</li>
<li>Eligible securities are U.S. Treasuries and <em>high quality</em> mortgage-backed securities</li>
<li>There is no haircut, banks can borrow up to <em>100% of the collateral</em></li>
<li>That collateral is valued <em>at par, not market value</em></li>
<li>The rate is the <em>1 year overnight swap rate (OIS)</em> plus <em>10 (measly) bps</em></li>
<li><em>No pre-payment</em> penalty</li>
<li>Loan term is for <em>1 year</em></li>
<li><em>No transaction fees</em></li>
<li><em>Treasury is backstopping</em> the Fed banks for program</li>
<li>Program is in effect until <em>at least</em> March 11, 2024</li>
</ul>
<p>In other words, there are <em>no fees</em>, <em>no penalties</em>, banks can pledge Treasuries and <em>borrow against 100%</em> of their <em>face value</em> at a cost of the <em>1yr swap rate + 10bps</em>.<br />
In finance, we would call this a <em>sweetheart deal</em>. So attractive as to be unethical or illegal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: jmccallum		</title>
		<link>https://rightsideofthechart.com/stock-market-faamg-analysis-3-29-23/#comment-26957</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jmccallum]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Mar 2023 18:37:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://rightsideofthechart.com/?p=211117#comment-26957</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://rightsideofthechart.com/stock-market-faamg-analysis-3-29-23/#comment-26956&quot;&gt;jmccallum&lt;/a&gt;.

ist week]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://rightsideofthechart.com/stock-market-faamg-analysis-3-29-23/#comment-26956">jmccallum</a>.</p>
<p>ist week</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: jmccallum		</title>
		<link>https://rightsideofthechart.com/stock-market-faamg-analysis-3-29-23/#comment-26956</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jmccallum]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Mar 2023 18:33:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://rightsideofthechart.com/?p=211117#comment-26956</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://rightsideofthechart.com/stock-market-faamg-analysis-3-29-23/#comment-26955&quot;&gt;Jeff Vandenburgh&lt;/a&gt;.

BTFP takes the US Treasury-collateralized lending of a standard repo transaction, and adds in the money-out-of-nowhere mechanism of &lt;abbr class=&#039;c2c-text-hover&#039; title=&#039;Quantitative easing (QE) is a type of monetary policy used by central banks to stimulate the economy when standard monetary policy has become ineffective.&#039;&gt;QE&lt;/abbr&gt; to create a somewhat non-infinite liquidity facility. &lt;strong&gt;This facility allows banks to come as they please and pledge their distressed, devalued USTs and MBS as collateral, receiving the full value of those securities in cash in return.&lt;/strong&gt;
The Fed isn’t buying securities per se, but it’s preventing the forced selling of distressed securities by allowing banks to borrow cash well in excess of the value of those securities—&lt;strong&gt;that money is created from nowhere&lt;/strong&gt;, and while it must be paid back, it still has &lt;strong&gt;the same net stimulating, risk-taking effect of introducing liquidity into the system that is characteristic of past Quantitative Easing (QE) programs&lt;/strong&gt;. 
Lending against devalued collateral at par is &lt;strong&gt;stimulative. &lt;/strong&gt;Whatever you want to call this money-from-nowhere UST-collateralized loan program, &lt;strong&gt;financial conditions have eased&lt;/strong&gt;. Given that it must be repaid, perhaps a better name would be &lt;em&gt;Quantitative Teasing…&lt;/em&gt;
By lending against distressed, deeply discounted assets at par, the Fed and Treasury are flooding new dollar value into the system over the collateral value. It’s a standard repo transaction, that has the same value-creation effect of QE—&lt;a href=&quot;https://twitter.com/JoeConsorti/status/1635094993034690560?s=20&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;noopener nofollow ugc&quot;&gt;stealth QE&lt;/a&gt;.

BTFP is big enough to theoretically cover all unrealized losses in the banking sector, some $650 billion, all of which can tap this facility &lt;strong&gt;unbeknownst to its counterparts. That’s right, the Fed and Treasury will not reveal who uses BTFP emergency loans until 2025 at the earliest. &lt;/strong&gt;Remember the stigma associated with borrowing from the Fed we discussed earlier? Now banks have no way of knowing who’s in a fragile capital position, so they have no way of avoiding risky counterparties. The potential usage of this facility is staggeringly high, and neither the banks who deal with one another nor the public will know who uses it, &lt;strong&gt;introducing untold levels of highly dispersed, invisible risk to the banking sector, making an already fragile financial network all the more fragile.&lt;/strong&gt;
QT won’t meaningfully continue—any further balance sheet roll-off is performative as long as banks continue to tap BTFP &lt;strong&gt;forcing the Fed’s balance sheet to expand on net.&lt;/strong&gt; This past week saw the Fed’s balance sheet expand by $297 billion, effectively erasing half of the QT it’s taken nearly a year to complete:

https://thebitcoinlayer.substack.com/p/btfp-stealth-qe-banks-in-extreme]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://rightsideofthechart.com/stock-market-faamg-analysis-3-29-23/#comment-26955">Jeff Vandenburgh</a>.</p>
<p>BTFP takes the US Treasury-collateralized lending of a standard repo transaction, and adds in the money-out-of-nowhere mechanism of <abbr class='c2c-text-hover' title='Quantitative easing (QE) is a type of monetary policy used by central banks to stimulate the economy when standard monetary policy has become ineffective.'>QE</abbr> to create a somewhat non-infinite liquidity facility. <strong>This facility allows banks to come as they please and pledge their distressed, devalued USTs and MBS as collateral, receiving the full value of those securities in cash in return.</strong><br />
The Fed isn’t buying securities per se, but it’s preventing the forced selling of distressed securities by allowing banks to borrow cash well in excess of the value of those securities—<strong>that money is created from nowhere</strong>, and while it must be paid back, it still has <strong>the same net stimulating, risk-taking effect of introducing liquidity into the system that is characteristic of past Quantitative Easing (QE) programs</strong>.<br />
Lending against devalued collateral at par is <strong>stimulative. </strong>Whatever you want to call this money-from-nowhere UST-collateralized loan program, <strong>financial conditions have eased</strong>. Given that it must be repaid, perhaps a better name would be <em>Quantitative Teasing…</em><br />
By lending against distressed, deeply discounted assets at par, the Fed and Treasury are flooding new dollar value into the system over the collateral value. It’s a standard repo transaction, that has the same value-creation effect of QE—<a href="https://twitter.com/JoeConsorti/status/1635094993034690560?s=20" target="_blank" rel="noopener nofollow ugc">stealth QE</a>.</p>
<p>BTFP is big enough to theoretically cover all unrealized losses in the banking sector, some $650 billion, all of which can tap this facility <strong>unbeknownst to its counterparts. That’s right, the Fed and Treasury will not reveal who uses BTFP emergency loans until 2025 at the earliest. </strong>Remember the stigma associated with borrowing from the Fed we discussed earlier? Now banks have no way of knowing who’s in a fragile capital position, so they have no way of avoiding risky counterparties. The potential usage of this facility is staggeringly high, and neither the banks who deal with one another nor the public will know who uses it, <strong>introducing untold levels of highly dispersed, invisible risk to the banking sector, making an already fragile financial network all the more fragile.</strong><br />
QT won’t meaningfully continue—any further balance sheet roll-off is performative as long as banks continue to tap BTFP <strong>forcing the Fed’s balance sheet to expand on net.</strong> This past week saw the Fed’s balance sheet expand by $297 billion, effectively erasing half of the QT it’s taken nearly a year to complete:</p>
<p><a href="https://thebitcoinlayer.substack.com/p/btfp-stealth-qe-banks-in-extreme" rel="nofollow ugc">https://thebitcoinlayer.substack.com/p/btfp-stealth-qe-banks-in-extreme</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Jeff Vandenburgh		</title>
		<link>https://rightsideofthechart.com/stock-market-faamg-analysis-3-29-23/#comment-26955</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff Vandenburgh]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Mar 2023 18:11:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://rightsideofthechart.com/?p=211117#comment-26955</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://rightsideofthechart.com/stock-market-faamg-analysis-3-29-23/#comment-26954&quot;&gt;jmccallum&lt;/a&gt;.

Please educate us, then.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://rightsideofthechart.com/stock-market-faamg-analysis-3-29-23/#comment-26954">jmccallum</a>.</p>
<p>Please educate us, then.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: jmccallum		</title>
		<link>https://rightsideofthechart.com/stock-market-faamg-analysis-3-29-23/#comment-26954</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jmccallum]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Mar 2023 18:08:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://rightsideofthechart.com/?p=211117#comment-26954</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://rightsideofthechart.com/stock-market-faamg-analysis-3-29-23/#comment-26953&quot;&gt;Jeff Vandenburgh&lt;/a&gt;.

Jeff, his explanation is ridiculous. Sterilized? loan? sorry, no.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://rightsideofthechart.com/stock-market-faamg-analysis-3-29-23/#comment-26953">Jeff Vandenburgh</a>.</p>
<p>Jeff, his explanation is ridiculous. Sterilized? loan? sorry, no.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Jeff Vandenburgh		</title>
		<link>https://rightsideofthechart.com/stock-market-faamg-analysis-3-29-23/#comment-26953</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff Vandenburgh]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Mar 2023 17:56:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://rightsideofthechart.com/?p=211117#comment-26953</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://rightsideofthechart.com/stock-market-faamg-analysis-3-29-23/#comment-26952&quot;&gt;Jeff Vandenburgh&lt;/a&gt;.

https://twitter.com/i/status/1636373785774538753]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://rightsideofthechart.com/stock-market-faamg-analysis-3-29-23/#comment-26952">Jeff Vandenburgh</a>.</p>
<p><a href="https://twitter.com/i/status/1636373785774538753" rel="nofollow ugc">https://twitter.com/i/status/1636373785774538753</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Jeff Vandenburgh		</title>
		<link>https://rightsideofthechart.com/stock-market-faamg-analysis-3-29-23/#comment-26952</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff Vandenburgh]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Mar 2023 17:54:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://rightsideofthechart.com/?p=211117#comment-26952</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://rightsideofthechart.com/stock-market-faamg-analysis-3-29-23/#comment-26951&quot;&gt;Manuj&lt;/a&gt;.

He&#039;s joking with you.  But ultimately, this is not &lt;abbr class=&#039;c2c-text-hover&#039; title=&#039;Quantitative easing (QE) is a type of monetary policy used by central banks to stimulate the economy when standard monetary policy has become ineffective.&#039;&gt;QE&lt;/abbr&gt; in the traditional sense.  Darius Dale explains it in this in his pinned tweet:  https://twitter.com/42MacroWeather]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://rightsideofthechart.com/stock-market-faamg-analysis-3-29-23/#comment-26951">Manuj</a>.</p>
<p>He&#8217;s joking with you.  But ultimately, this is not <abbr class='c2c-text-hover' title='Quantitative easing (QE) is a type of monetary policy used by central banks to stimulate the economy when standard monetary policy has become ineffective.'>QE</abbr> in the traditional sense.  Darius Dale explains it in this in his pinned tweet:  <a href="https://twitter.com/42MacroWeather" rel="nofollow ugc">https://twitter.com/42MacroWeather</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Manuj		</title>
		<link>https://rightsideofthechart.com/stock-market-faamg-analysis-3-29-23/#comment-26951</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Manuj]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Mar 2023 17:42:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://rightsideofthechart.com/?p=211117#comment-26951</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://rightsideofthechart.com/stock-market-faamg-analysis-3-29-23/#comment-26948&quot;&gt;JimG&lt;/a&gt;.

It had been 0.96 (96%) positive correlation during the big part of last 15 years, why wont matter now? You can compare Fed Balance Sheet and the SP500, check it out.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://rightsideofthechart.com/stock-market-faamg-analysis-3-29-23/#comment-26948">JimG</a>.</p>
<p>It had been 0.96 (96%) positive correlation during the big part of last 15 years, why wont matter now? You can compare Fed Balance Sheet and the SP500, check it out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: jmccallum		</title>
		<link>https://rightsideofthechart.com/stock-market-faamg-analysis-3-29-23/#comment-26949</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jmccallum]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Mar 2023 17:29:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://rightsideofthechart.com/?p=211117#comment-26949</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[lee always had some good stuff]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>lee always had some good stuff</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: JimG		</title>
		<link>https://rightsideofthechart.com/stock-market-faamg-analysis-3-29-23/#comment-26948</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[JimG]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Mar 2023 17:28:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://rightsideofthechart.com/?p=211117#comment-26948</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://rightsideofthechart.com/stock-market-faamg-analysis-3-29-23/#comment-26947&quot;&gt;trade0039&lt;/a&gt;.

Nah dumping 500 billion into the system and telling banks and depositors of every kind they cannot lose no matter what they&#039;ve done has no effect on asset prices.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://rightsideofthechart.com/stock-market-faamg-analysis-3-29-23/#comment-26947">trade0039</a>.</p>
<p>Nah dumping 500 billion into the system and telling banks and depositors of every kind they cannot lose no matter what they&#8217;ve done has no effect on asset prices.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: trade0039		</title>
		<link>https://rightsideofthechart.com/stock-market-faamg-analysis-3-29-23/#comment-26947</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[trade0039]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Mar 2023 17:22:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://rightsideofthechart.com/?p=211117#comment-26947</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://rightsideofthechart.com/stock-market-faamg-analysis-3-29-23/#comment-26946&quot;&gt;Manuj&lt;/a&gt;.

That kinda worries me too!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://rightsideofthechart.com/stock-market-faamg-analysis-3-29-23/#comment-26946">Manuj</a>.</p>
<p>That kinda worries me too!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Manuj		</title>
		<link>https://rightsideofthechart.com/stock-market-faamg-analysis-3-29-23/#comment-26946</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Manuj]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Mar 2023 17:13:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://rightsideofthechart.com/?p=211117#comment-26946</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hi Randy, have you seen how the FED Balance sheet has increased the last 3 weeks? Always in the past this have affected the market. We should bear that in mind, don´t you think?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Randy, have you seen how the FED Balance sheet has increased the last 3 weeks? Always in the past this have affected the market. We should bear that in mind, don´t you think?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Jim		</title>
		<link>https://rightsideofthechart.com/stock-market-faamg-analysis-3-29-23/#comment-26945</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Mar 2023 16:28:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://rightsideofthechart.com/?p=211117#comment-26945</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Excellent coverage Randy. Thanks.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent coverage Randy. Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: moshr0		</title>
		<link>https://rightsideofthechart.com/stock-market-faamg-analysis-3-29-23/#comment-26944</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[moshr0]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Mar 2023 16:24:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://rightsideofthechart.com/?p=211117#comment-26944</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Thanks for the update Randy!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the update Randy!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
