<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Pre-Market Comments- QQQ	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://rightsideofthechart.com/pre-market-comments-qqq/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://rightsideofthechart.com/pre-market-comments-qqq/</link>
	<description>Stock Trading, Investing &#38; Market Analysis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2016 14:45:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: rsotc		</title>
		<link>https://rightsideofthechart.com/pre-market-comments-qqq/#comment-779</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[rsotc]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2016 14:45:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightsideofthechart.com/?p=169361#comment-779</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[jupiter- As close as we are to the 100 level (closing 2% above yesterday), that may have been it so any meaningful rally that starts soon could get enough traction to last for weeks. The short reply is that I just don&#039;t know, at least at this time, the answer to your question. One thing that I try to force myself to do in trading is to step aside when my read on the charts isn&#039;t very good. Chances are that most of the &quot;meat&quot; on the bone for the TQQQ/QQQ short trade has already been consumed, at least for the initial leg down (assuming that we are still in the early stages of a new bear market with much more to come). If so, I&#039;ll just have to determine the next objective entry as the charts develop.

Regarding the current (Active) TQQQ/QQQ short trade, the most objective entry was the original short which was posted on Oct 28th (less than 2% from the top). The second most, but still very objective entry was the breakdown of that that Oct-Jan sideways trading range &amp; especially the backtest which occurred shortly after. From there, the &lt;abbr class=&#039;c2c-text-hover&#039; title=&#039;Risk-to-Reward Ratio. e.g.- a 3:1 R/R would entail risking $1 of loss for every $3 of profit potential on the trade.&#039;&gt;R/R&lt;/abbr&gt; steadily diminished with each tick lower to the point now where the R/R most likely is skewed to the long-side, despite the fact that the markets are in a vicious &amp; clearly defined &lt;abbr class=&#039;c2c-text-hover&#039; title=&#039;A downtrend occurs when a security or index is making a series of lower lows &#038; lower highs.&#039;&gt;downtrend&lt;/abbr&gt;. Skewed towards, but not heavily or clearly favoring the long side... at least not yet. Again, to your question, I don&#039;t have a good answer just yet but will continue to study the charts and communicate my thoughts as soon as I have an opinion that might be worth sharing. G-luck on your trades!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>jupiter- As close as we are to the 100 level (closing 2% above yesterday), that may have been it so any meaningful rally that starts soon could get enough traction to last for weeks. The short reply is that I just don&#8217;t know, at least at this time, the answer to your question. One thing that I try to force myself to do in trading is to step aside when my read on the charts isn&#8217;t very good. Chances are that most of the &#8220;meat&#8221; on the bone for the TQQQ/QQQ short trade has already been consumed, at least for the initial leg down (assuming that we are still in the early stages of a new bear market with much more to come). If so, I&#8217;ll just have to determine the next objective entry as the charts develop.</p>
<p>Regarding the current (Active) TQQQ/QQQ short trade, the most objective entry was the original short which was posted on Oct 28th (less than 2% from the top). The second most, but still very objective entry was the breakdown of that that Oct-Jan sideways trading range &#038; especially the backtest which occurred shortly after. From there, the <abbr class='c2c-text-hover' title='Risk-to-Reward Ratio. e.g.- a 3:1 R/R would entail risking $1 of loss for every $3 of profit potential on the trade.'>R/R</abbr> steadily diminished with each tick lower to the point now where the R/R most likely is skewed to the long-side, despite the fact that the markets are in a vicious &#038; clearly defined <abbr class='c2c-text-hover' title='A downtrend occurs when a security or index is making a series of lower lows &amp; lower highs.'>downtrend</abbr>. Skewed towards, but not heavily or clearly favoring the long side&#8230; at least not yet. Again, to your question, I don&#8217;t have a good answer just yet but will continue to study the charts and communicate my thoughts as soon as I have an opinion that might be worth sharing. G-luck on your trades!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: jupiter		</title>
		<link>https://rightsideofthechart.com/pre-market-comments-qqq/#comment-778</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jupiter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2016 14:13:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightsideofthechart.com/?p=169361#comment-778</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hi Randy, 

Should we get a rally either this week or next, how can we know if that rally will be sold, and we reload to short?

Thank you.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Randy, </p>
<p>Should we get a rally either this week or next, how can we know if that rally will be sold, and we reload to short?</p>
<p>Thank you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
