<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Natural Gas Technical Analysis	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://rightsideofthechart.com/natural-gas-technical-analysis/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://rightsideofthechart.com/natural-gas-technical-analysis/</link>
	<description>Stock Trading, Investing &#38; Market Analysis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2018 22:38:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: rsotc		</title>
		<link>https://rightsideofthechart.com/natural-gas-technical-analysis/#comment-3990</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[rsotc]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2018 18:27:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://rightsideofthechart.com/?p=184896#comment-3990</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Very possible, especially considering the vigor of the recent rally. However, to go long on that pullback still doesn&#039;t offer a highly favorable &lt;abbr class=&#039;c2c-text-hover&#039; title=&#039;Risk-to-Reward Ratio. e.g.- a 3:1 R/R would entail risking $1 of loss for every $3 of profit potential on the trade.&#039;&gt;R/R&lt;/abbr&gt; since /NG is still slightly below a pretty significant resistance level around 3.10-3.12 &amp; if it takes out last night&#039;s high soon &amp; runs up to the 3.10-3.12 area to test it again, the same divergences that were in place at last night&#039;s highs will still be in place, only larger. I &#039;d prefer to see a larger correction before going long again, even if that means missing out on more upside before that happens.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very possible, especially considering the vigor of the recent rally. However, to go long on that pullback still doesn&#8217;t offer a highly favorable <abbr class='c2c-text-hover' title='Risk-to-Reward Ratio. e.g.- a 3:1 R/R would entail risking $1 of loss for every $3 of profit potential on the trade.'>R/R</abbr> since /NG is still slightly below a pretty significant resistance level around 3.10-3.12 &#038; if it takes out last night&#8217;s high soon &#038; runs up to the 3.10-3.12 area to test it again, the same divergences that were in place at last night&#8217;s highs will still be in place, only larger. I &#8216;d prefer to see a larger correction before going long again, even if that means missing out on more upside before that happens.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: GetItRiight		</title>
		<link>https://rightsideofthechart.com/natural-gas-technical-analysis/#comment-3989</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[GetItRiight]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2018 16:31:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://rightsideofthechart.com/?p=184896#comment-3989</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Do you think this retracement to 2.96 during the regular trading session,  satisfies the scope of the negative divergence?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you think this retracement to 2.96 during the regular trading session,  satisfies the scope of the negative divergence?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
