<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: NAT Long Trade Up 14% While Approaching Resistance	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://rightsideofthechart.com/nat-long-trade-up-14-while-approaching-resistance/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://rightsideofthechart.com/nat-long-trade-up-14-while-approaching-resistance/</link>
	<description>Stock Trading, Investing &#38; Market Analysis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Mar 2017 02:20:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: rsotc		</title>
		<link>https://rightsideofthechart.com/nat-long-trade-up-14-while-approaching-resistance/#comment-892</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[rsotc]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2016 01:14:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightsideofthechart.com/?p=169791#comment-892</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;a href=&quot;http://rightsideofthechart.com/members/whoops/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;@whoops&lt;/a&gt; I was just trying to catch up on questions &amp; comments that I might have missed with all of the increased activity lately &amp; just came across your question. After re-reading my post, I just realized that my caffeine must not have kicked in at the time I posted that update. That R1 level, the same one posted on this chart &amp; the previous daily chart, is positioned at (exactly) 13.76. Pardon my brain fart &amp; delayed response.I should have stated that resistance level as 13.75, not 13.25.
The near-vertical momentum in NAT carried it above, what I meant to state as the 13.75 level, during the trading session today, only the see the stock close back below that resistance level. I often refer to this as a momentum-fueled-overshoot (of resistance or support, during a sharp selloff). NAT was also rejected off the 200-day &lt;abbr class=&#039;c2c-text-hover&#039; title=&#039;An exponential moving average (EMA) is a type of moving average that is similar to a simple moving average, except that more weight is given to the latest data. This type of moving average reacts faster to recent price changes than a simple moving average. (source: investopedia.com)&#039;&gt;EMA&lt;/abbr&gt; today, which is the red line on the recent daily charts that were posted. The 200-day ema has done a decent job of support &amp; resistance on NAT in recent years. To answer your question, the next resistance remains the primary &lt;abbr class=&#039;c2c-text-hover&#039; title=&#039;A downtrend occurs when a security or index is making a series of lower lows &#038; lower highs.&#039;&gt;downtrend&lt;/abbr&gt; line from the weekly chart (still approximately 20% above current levels).]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://rightsideofthechart.com/members/whoops/" rel="nofollow">@whoops</a> I was just trying to catch up on questions &#038; comments that I might have missed with all of the increased activity lately &#038; just came across your question. After re-reading my post, I just realized that my caffeine must not have kicked in at the time I posted that update. That R1 level, the same one posted on this chart &#038; the previous daily chart, is positioned at (exactly) 13.76. Pardon my brain fart &#038; delayed response.I should have stated that resistance level as 13.75, not 13.25.<br />
The near-vertical momentum in NAT carried it above, what I meant to state as the 13.75 level, during the trading session today, only the see the stock close back below that resistance level. I often refer to this as a momentum-fueled-overshoot (of resistance or support, during a sharp selloff). NAT was also rejected off the 200-day <abbr class='c2c-text-hover' title='An exponential moving average (EMA) is a type of moving average that is similar to a simple moving average, except that more weight is given to the latest data. This type of moving average reacts faster to recent price changes than a simple moving average. (source: investopedia.com)'>EMA</abbr> today, which is the red line on the recent daily charts that were posted. The 200-day ema has done a decent job of support &#038; resistance on NAT in recent years. To answer your question, the next resistance remains the primary <abbr class='c2c-text-hover' title='A downtrend occurs when a security or index is making a series of lower lows &amp; lower highs.'>downtrend</abbr> line from the weekly chart (still approximately 20% above current levels).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: whoops		</title>
		<link>https://rightsideofthechart.com/nat-long-trade-up-14-while-approaching-resistance/#comment-888</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[whoops]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2016 16:09:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightsideofthechart.com/?p=169791#comment-888</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[NAT is still looking good and it blow thru 13.25 like a hot knife thru butter!  What is the next resistance?  Thanks]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NAT is still looking good and it blow thru 13.25 like a hot knife thru butter!  What is the next resistance?  Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: rsotc		</title>
		<link>https://rightsideofthechart.com/nat-long-trade-up-14-while-approaching-resistance/#comment-884</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[rsotc]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2016 18:39:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightsideofthechart.com/?p=169791#comment-884</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;a href=&quot;http://rightsideofthechart.com/members/whoops/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;@whoops&lt;/a&gt; Thanks. I do plan on increasing the number &lt;abbr class=&#039;c2c-text-hover&#039; title=&#039;Growth &#038; Income Trades are longer-term swing trade or investments candidates expected to generate an above average dividend yield &#038; capital appreciation.&#039;&gt;Growth &amp; Income Trade&lt;/abbr&gt; ideas going forward.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://rightsideofthechart.com/members/whoops/" rel="nofollow">@whoops</a> Thanks. I do plan on increasing the number <abbr class='c2c-text-hover' title='Growth &amp; Income Trades are longer-term swing trade or investments candidates expected to generate an above average dividend yield &amp; capital appreciation.'>Growth &#038; Income Trade</abbr> ideas going forward.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: whoops		</title>
		<link>https://rightsideofthechart.com/nat-long-trade-up-14-while-approaching-resistance/#comment-883</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[whoops]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2016 16:00:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightsideofthechart.com/?p=169791#comment-883</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Nice call, I like that you have growth and income ideas. Hope you will have more of them!!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice call, I like that you have growth and income ideas. Hope you will have more of them!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
