<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: GDX Backtesting Sub-Channel	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://rightsideofthechart.com/gdx-backtesting-sub-channel/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://rightsideofthechart.com/gdx-backtesting-sub-channel/</link>
	<description>Stock Trading, Investing &#38; Market Analysis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Mar 2017 02:19:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Franklin4		</title>
		<link>https://rightsideofthechart.com/gdx-backtesting-sub-channel/#comment-957</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Franklin4]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Feb 2016 20:46:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightsideofthechart.com/?p=170001#comment-957</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://rightsideofthechart.com/gdx-backtesting-sub-channel/#comment-954&quot;&gt;rsotc&lt;/a&gt;.

Right, so basically a matter of whether you feel more comfortable battling Greeks, or brokerage firms. I decided to go the Persian route. Incidentally, the premiums on DUST were about half the strike, vs about 1/10 for NUGT. Might do the same with the Jrs later if all seems to be going according to planned.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://rightsideofthechart.com/gdx-backtesting-sub-channel/#comment-954">rsotc</a>.</p>
<p>Right, so basically a matter of whether you feel more comfortable battling Greeks, or brokerage firms. I decided to go the Persian route. Incidentally, the premiums on DUST were about half the strike, vs about 1/10 for NUGT. Might do the same with the Jrs later if all seems to be going according to planned.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: rsotc		</title>
		<link>https://rightsideofthechart.com/gdx-backtesting-sub-channel/#comment-954</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[rsotc]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Feb 2016 18:07:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightsideofthechart.com/?p=170001#comment-954</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I haven&#039;t pulled the option chains on NUGT &#038; DUST but I can tell you that options sellers are the smart money &#038; have most likely priced in the decay, excessive volatility &#038; then some. That trade might work but I&#039;d suggest doing the math as to where you expect DUST and NUGT to be at the time and make sure that you are still likely to make money after the bulk of those fat premiums have eroded away by the time those options start to approach their expiration date. G-luck if you pull the trigger &#038; if you see some compelling values in those LEAPS, please share it with us.
My preference to capitalize on the decay from DUST in NUGT over time is to short the one positioned opposite of where you expect the miners are heading (e.g.- DUST short if you think GDX is going much higher over the next 6+ months).
A much higher probability trade which would almost assure a profit no matter where GDX goes over time would be a paired trade; short NUGT &#038; short and short DUST. Essentially, you are capturing the decay on both while directly hedging your position as the gains in one will offset the gains in the other. Downside to that trade is that it is quite capital intensive not to mention the fact that your broker can call in shares (forced buy-in) on either position at any time, should they no longer have the shares to lend to you.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I haven&#8217;t pulled the option chains on NUGT &amp; DUST but I can tell you that options sellers are the smart money &amp; have most likely priced in the decay, excessive volatility &amp; then some. That trade might work but I&#8217;d suggest doing the math as to where you expect DUST and NUGT to be at the time and make sure that you are still likely to make money after the bulk of those fat premiums have eroded away by the time those options start to approach their expiration date. G-luck if you pull the trigger &amp; if you see some compelling values in those LEAPS, please share it with us.<br />
My preference to capitalize on the decay from DUST in NUGT over time is to short the one positioned opposite of where you expect the miners are heading (e.g.- DUST short if you think GDX is going much higher over the next 6+ months).<br />
A much higher probability trade which would almost assure a profit no matter where GDX goes over time would be a paired trade; short NUGT &amp; short and short DUST. Essentially, you are capturing the decay on both while directly hedging your position as the gains in one will offset the gains in the other. Downside to that trade is that it is quite capital intensive not to mention the fact that your broker can call in shares (forced buy-in) on either position at any time, should they no longer have the shares to lend to you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: ben711		</title>
		<link>https://rightsideofthechart.com/gdx-backtesting-sub-channel/#comment-952</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ben711]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Feb 2016 17:46:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightsideofthechart.com/?p=170001#comment-952</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://rightsideofthechart.com/gdx-backtesting-sub-channel/#comment-951&quot;&gt;Franklin4&lt;/a&gt;.

I also wonder if there are any disadvantages of doing just that.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://rightsideofthechart.com/gdx-backtesting-sub-channel/#comment-951">Franklin4</a>.</p>
<p>I also wonder if there are any disadvantages of doing just that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Franklin4		</title>
		<link>https://rightsideofthechart.com/gdx-backtesting-sub-channel/#comment-951</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Franklin4]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Feb 2016 17:27:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightsideofthechart.com/?p=170001#comment-951</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The fact that you can buy LEAP options on NUGT and DUST almost has me wonder why it&#039;s even worth it trying to play gold any other way for the long term. Just go even money puts on both through Jan 2019 and watch as the bottom completely falls out of one while the other just sort of slowly deflates into the money. Or, maybe gold stays flat and they both die a slow, lingering death for a while.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The fact that you can buy LEAP options on NUGT and DUST almost has me wonder why it&#8217;s even worth it trying to play gold any other way for the long term. Just go even money puts on both through Jan 2019 and watch as the bottom completely falls out of one while the other just sort of slowly deflates into the money. Or, maybe gold stays flat and they both die a slow, lingering death for a while.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
