<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Euro Backtesting Wedge + GDX Trendline Backtest	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://rightsideofthechart.com/euro-backtesting-wedge-gdx-trendline-backtest/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://rightsideofthechart.com/euro-backtesting-wedge-gdx-trendline-backtest/</link>
	<description>Stock Trading, Investing &#38; Market Analysis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Mar 2017 02:20:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: rsotc		</title>
		<link>https://rightsideofthechart.com/euro-backtesting-wedge-gdx-trendline-backtest/#comment-873</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[rsotc]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2016 17:06:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightsideofthechart.com/?p=169738#comment-873</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A couple of reasons: 1) 15.80 is only my minimum downside target. Yes, the next logical target would be the bottom of the Feb 3/4 gap. 2) 15.80ish is also the top of that gap. Tops of gaps often act as support when initially backtested from above. 3)15.80 is horizontal price support, defined by numerous reactions and gaps going all the way back to the July 17/20 gap in 2015. 4) 15.80 is also the 38.2% Fib retractment of the rip off the Jan 19 &amp; 21st lows. Key Fib level + price support + top of gap = very good support level which is likely to be tested at least once before GDX goes on to new highs. Finally, to allow everyone who&#039;s been dying to get long the miners step in &amp; buy on that perfect backtest of that well-defined primary &lt;abbr class=&#039;c2c-text-hover&#039; title=&#039;A downtrend occurs when a security or index is making a series of lower lows &#038; lower highs.&#039;&gt;downtrend&lt;/abbr&gt; line is just a bit &quot;too easy&quot; in my book. Maybe that proves to be it for this pullback but I&#039;m betting those who stepped in to buy that backtest will get burned.. very soon. &lt;abbr class=&#039;c2c-text-hover&#039; title=&#039;Just My Humble Opinion&#039;&gt;JMHO&lt;/abbr&gt; &amp; again, assuming GDX has more downside, I may extend my target(s).]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A couple of reasons: 1) 15.80 is only my minimum downside target. Yes, the next logical target would be the bottom of the Feb 3/4 gap. 2) 15.80ish is also the top of that gap. Tops of gaps often act as support when initially backtested from above. 3)15.80 is horizontal price support, defined by numerous reactions and gaps going all the way back to the July 17/20 gap in 2015. 4) 15.80 is also the 38.2% Fib retractment of the rip off the Jan 19 &#038; 21st lows. Key Fib level + price support + top of gap = very good support level which is likely to be tested at least once before GDX goes on to new highs. Finally, to allow everyone who&#8217;s been dying to get long the miners step in &#038; buy on that perfect backtest of that well-defined primary <abbr class='c2c-text-hover' title='A downtrend occurs when a security or index is making a series of lower lows &amp; lower highs.'>downtrend</abbr> line is just a bit &#8220;too easy&#8221; in my book. Maybe that proves to be it for this pullback but I&#8217;m betting those who stepped in to buy that backtest will get burned.. very soon. <abbr class='c2c-text-hover' title='Just My Humble Opinion'>JMHO</abbr> &#038; again, assuming GDX has more downside, I may extend my target(s).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: RickySixx6		</title>
		<link>https://rightsideofthechart.com/euro-backtesting-wedge-gdx-trendline-backtest/#comment-872</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[RickySixx6]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2016 16:56:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightsideofthechart.com/?p=169738#comment-872</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m surprised you&#039;re marking  15.80 and not 15.35 which represents a filling of the Feb 3 -&#062; Feb 4 Gap    Is there a reason for that or are gaps fills not always a target to focus on?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m surprised you&#8217;re marking  15.80 and not 15.35 which represents a filling of the Feb 3 -&gt; Feb 4 Gap    Is there a reason for that or are gaps fills not always a target to focus on?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
