<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Active Short Trades Overview 9-15-16 (video)	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://rightsideofthechart.com/active-short-trades-overview-9-15-16-video/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://rightsideofthechart.com/active-short-trades-overview-9-15-16-video/</link>
	<description>Stock Trading, Investing &#38; Market Analysis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2018 19:54:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: rsotc		</title>
		<link>https://rightsideofthechart.com/active-short-trades-overview-9-15-16-video/#comment-2564</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[rsotc]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2016 14:15:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightsideofthechart.com/?p=172969#comment-2564</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://rightsideofthechart.com/active-short-trades-overview-9-15-16-video/#comment-2563&quot;&gt;Eric K&lt;/a&gt;.

Good point Eric. While any those trades that were either backtesting a recently broken trendline or former horizontal support, now resistance level were/are providing objective add-ons or new short entries, with some ambiguity in the charts, at least with QQQ (as SPY, MDY, IWM and all other indices remains in a clearly bearish near-term technical posture), it would be prudent to wait for the effects of the AAPL induced rally to fade with QQQ clearly falling back below 116.00 again, especially in light of the fact that many of the active shorts are in the semiconductor or tech sector. As such, those trades, despite clearly bearish technicals, have an increased chance of following the tech-heavy Nasdaq 100 as they tend of have a high correlation with that index.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://rightsideofthechart.com/active-short-trades-overview-9-15-16-video/#comment-2563">Eric K</a>.</p>
<p>Good point Eric. While any those trades that were either backtesting a recently broken trendline or former horizontal support, now resistance level were/are providing objective add-ons or new short entries, with some ambiguity in the charts, at least with QQQ (as SPY, MDY, IWM and all other indices remains in a clearly bearish near-term technical posture), it would be prudent to wait for the effects of the AAPL induced rally to fade with QQQ clearly falling back below 116.00 again, especially in light of the fact that many of the active shorts are in the semiconductor or tech sector. As such, those trades, despite clearly bearish technicals, have an increased chance of following the tech-heavy Nasdaq 100 as they tend of have a high correlation with that index.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Eric K		</title>
		<link>https://rightsideofthechart.com/active-short-trades-overview-9-15-16-video/#comment-2563</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Eric K]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2016 13:40:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightsideofthechart.com/?p=172969#comment-2563</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;a href=&#039;http://rightsideofthechart.com/members/rsotc/&#039;&gt;@RSOTC&lt;/a&gt; Randy, thanks for the analysis as always. You didn&#039;t mention reasonable places to add or re-enter any of these positions. I&#039;m going to keep it light going into FOMC but if you feel any of these represents a particularly attractive re-entry, please do tell.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href='http://rightsideofthechart.com/members/rsotc/'>@RSOTC</a> Randy, thanks for the analysis as always. You didn&#8217;t mention reasonable places to add or re-enter any of these positions. I&#8217;m going to keep it light going into FOMC but if you feel any of these represents a particularly attractive re-entry, please do tell.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
